The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: The article examines which subjectively evaluated indoor environmental parameters and building features mostly affect occupants' satisfaction in mainly US office buildings. The study analyzed data from a web-based survey administered to 52,980 occupants in 351 office buildings over 10 years by the Center for the Built Environment. The survey uses 7-point ordered scale questions pertaining to satisfaction with indoor environmental parameters, workspace, and building features. The average building occupant was satisfied with his/her workspace and building. Proportional odds ordinal logistic regression shows that satisfaction with all 15 parameters listed in the survey contributed significantly to overall workspace satisfaction. The most important parameters were satisfaction with amount of space (odds ratio OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.55-1.59), noise level (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.29), and visual privacy (OR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.24-1.28). Satisfaction with amount of space was ranked to be most important for workspace satisfaction, regardless of age group (below 30, 31-50 or over 50 years old), gender, type of office (single or shared offices, or cubicles), distance of workspace from a window (within 4.6 m or further), or satisfaction level with workspace (satisfied or dissatisfied). Satisfaction with amount of space was not related to the gross amount of space available per person. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: To maximize workspace satisfaction, designer should invest in aspects that increase satisfaction with amount of space and storage, noise level, and visual privacy. Office workers will be most satisfied with their workspace and building when located close to a window in a private office. This may affect job satisfaction, work performance, and personal and company productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801686 · Cited by 3,253
The impact of psychological distress on absence from work
Hardy, G. E., Woods, D., & Wall, T. D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.306 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Green roofs and facades: A comprehensive review
Besir, A. B., & Cuce, E. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.106 · Cited by 616
Kim, J., Schiavon, S., & Brager, G. (2018) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.023 · Cited by 522
Self-citationKim, J., Zhou, Y., Schiavon, S., Raftery, P., & Brager, G. (2018) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.011 · Cited by 478
Self-citationTen questions concerning well-being in the built environment
Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P. M., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J. A., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949 · Cited by 303
Self-citationPark, J. Y., & Nagy, Z. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.102 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Frontczak, M., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-10-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-131
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1564305667
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
- The paper
- Frontczak, M., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.