Cited by 34Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAnimal testing and alternativesVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Clinical chemistry and hematology values in a Caribbean population of African green monkeys

Liddie, Shervin, Goody, Robin J., Valles, Rodrigo, Lawrence, Matthew S.·2010·Journal of Medical Primatology

Abstract

Background Hematology and clinical chemistry (HCC) reference values are critical in veterinary practice and in vivo pre‐clinical research, enabling detection of health abnormalities, response to therapeutic intervention or adverse toxicological effects, as well as monitoring of clinical management. Methods In this report, reference ranges for 46 HCC parameters were characterized in 331 wild‐caught and colony‐bred African green monkeys. Effects of sex, weight and duration of captivity were determined by one‐way analysis of variance. Results Significant sex differences were observed for several HCC parameters. Significant differences were also observed for select HCC variables between newly caught animals and those held in captivity for 1–12 months or longer. Conclusions Comparison of this data with other non‐human primate species and humans highlights similarities and disparities between species. Potential causes of interpopulation variability and relevance to the use of the African green monkey as a non‐human primate model are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2010.00422.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statistical comparisons were considered significant if p < 0.01 because of the small sample size (n = 3/group) and daily variations in cell numbers and serum chemistries.

    “Due to the small sample size (n = 3/group) and daily variations in cell numbers and serum chemistries, statistical comparisons were considered to be significant if p < 0.01.31,37,38”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liddie, S., Goody, R. J., Valles, R., & Lawrence, M. S.
Corresponding author
Lawrence, Matthew S.
Venue
Journal of Medical Primatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
389-398
ISSN
  • 0047-2565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0684
OpenAlex
W1899674496
Cited by
34
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Primatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
vervet monkey, Chlorocebus aethiops, reference values, hematology, clinical chemistry, nonhuman primate model, sex differences, interpopulation variability, Caribbean population
MeSH terms
Albumins, Alkaline Phosphatase, Animals, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Bilirubin, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Chlorocebus aethiops, Cholesterol, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Female, Globulins, Male, Minerals, Sex Characteristics, Triglycerides, Caribbean Region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review