Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lag‐phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts

Aikio, Sami, Duncan, Richard P., Hulme, Philip E.·2010·Oikos

Abstract

Temporal trends in biological invasions are often described by a lag‐phase of little or no increase in species occurrence followed by an increase‐phase in which species occurrence rises rapidly. While several biological and environmental mechanisms may underlie lag‐phases, they may also represent statistical artefacts or temporal changes in sampling effort. To date, distinguishing the facts from these artefacts has not been possible. Here we describe a method for estimating the lag‐phase in cumulative records of species occurrence, using a piecewise regression model that explicitly differentiates the lag and increase phases. We used the von Bertalanffy, logistic, linear and exponential functions to model the increase phase, and identified the best‐fitting function using model selection techniques. We confirmed the accuracy of our method using simulated data and then estimated the length of the lag‐phase (t lag ), the maximum collection rate (r) and the projected asymptotic number of records (K) using herbarium records for 105 weed species in New Zealand, while accounting for changes in sampling effort. Nearly all the New Zealand weed species had a lag‐phase, which averaged around 20–30 years, with 4% of species having a lag‐phase greater than 40 years. In more than two thirds of the cases, the accumulation of records was best modelled with the decelerating von Bertalanffy function, despite the tendency for temporal variation in sampling effort to force cumulative herbarium records to follow the sigmoidal shape of a logistic curve. A positive correlation between r and K is consistent with the assumption that the final distribution of an alien plant species reflects its rate of spread. Seemingly rare but fast‐spreading aliens may thus become tomorrow's noxious weeds. A positive correlation between inflection year and r warns that the weeds that have only begun to spread relatively recently may spread faster than previously known invaders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17963.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Aikio, S., Duncan, R. P., & Hulme, P. E.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
370-378
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W1995545667
Cited by
276
References
3
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lag‐phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17963.x
The paper
Aikio, S., Duncan, R. P., & Hulme, P. E. (2010). Lag‐phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17963.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.