Cited by 10Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Laminin‐511 and fibronectin degradation with Candida yeast

Pärnänen, Pirjo, Meurman, Jukka H., Virtanen, Ismo·2009·Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine

Abstract

Background: The invasion mechanism of Candida yeast is still partly unknown. In this study, we tested the ability of different commensal Candida yeast to degrade two basement membrane and extracellular matrix proteins: laminin‐511 (Lm‐511) and plasma fibronectin. Methods: Human Lm‐511 was produced by an immortal keratinocyte cell line, labelled with 35S‐methionine and immunoprecipitated from the growth medium with monoclonal antibodies. Human plasma fibronectin was purified from plasma samples of blood donors. Sonicated yeast cells and concentrated yeast cell growth media were incubated with Lm‐511 in different pH values and the degradation was detected by fluorography. Fibronectin degradation by yeast was visualized by sodium dodecyl‐sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results: The reduced 220 kDa fibronectin monomers were found to be degraded at pH 7.8 by 10× concentrated growth media of most strains tested and at pH 3.0 the degradation was more pronounced. Sonicated cell fractions of C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis caused degradation of plasma fibronectin at pH 7.8. Instead, none of the tested Candida cell fractions degraded Lm‐511 under these conditions. Conclusions: It seems that cleavage of different laminin isoforms by Candida yeast is a laminin‐specific process. The ability to cleave human plasma fibronectin is species‐ and pH‐dependent but not hyphal‐dependent and also this degradation may affect epithelial integrity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00785.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pärnänen, P., Meurman, J. H., & Virtanen, I.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Pärnänen, Pirjo
Venue
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
768-772
ISSN
  • 0300-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 0904-2512
  • 1600-0714
OpenAlex
W2104945871
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Suomen Hammaslääkäriliitto
  • Shandong Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida, laminin-511, fibronectin, protein degradation, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, basement membrane, extracellular matrix, pH dependence, epithelial barrier integrity, commensal yeast
MeSH terms
Candida, Candida albicans, Cell Fractionation, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Fibronectins, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Laminin, Culture Media, Conditioned, Protein Isoforms, Hyphae, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review