Cited by 86Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Health and Care Utilization

Relationship between malalignment of the teeth and periodontal disease

AINAMO, JUKKA·1972·European Journal of Oral Sciences

Abstract

– The occurrence and degree of displacement and rotation was recorded in the 4,316 fully erupted teeth of 154 Army recruits aged 19–22 years. Of the different teeth, it was the maxillary laterals and the mandibular second premolars which were most often found to be malaligned. In the maxillary anterior tooth areas, which had been fairly well brushed by the subjects, both the degree of oral cleanliness and the extent of periodontal disease were worse around the malaligned than around the aligned teeth. In the premolar areas the difference was less marked and it became non‐existent in the molar regions. The results indicated that malalignment of the teeth, as such, does not enhance periodontal breakdown but that it decreases the effect of average oral hygiene measures. Exceptionally good oral hygiene measures or, on the other hand, no oral hygiene measures at all, are thus less likely to reveal an association between malalignment and periodontal disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1972.tb00270.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-bite, misalignment/rotation of a tooth, and crowding of the maxillary and mandibular anterior sextant have been shown to be associated with increased plaque retention and gingivitis, greater probing depth, and bone and clinical attachment loss.

    “Cross-bite, 172,173 misalignment/rotation of a tooth, 174 and crowding of the maxillary 175 and mandibular anterior sextant 176 have been shown to be associated with increased plaque retention 176 and gingivitis, greater PD, and bone 177 and clinical attachment loss.178”

    From Dental prostheses and tooth‐related factors (2018) · cites this paper as [174]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AINAMO, J.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
AINAMO, JUKKA
Venue
European Journal of Oral Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-04
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
104-110
ISSN
  • 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
  • 0909-8836
  • 1600-0722
OpenAlex
W1992975842
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal Of Oral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
periodontal disease, tooth rotation, oral hygiene, mandibular second premolar, military recruits, periodontal tissue destruction
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicuspid, Dental Plaque, Gingivitis, Humans, Incisor, Male, Malocclusion, Mandible, Maxilla, Molar, Oral Health, Periodontal Diseases, Toothbrushing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review