Cited by 91Temporomandibular Joint DisordersPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Short‐term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masseter and temporalis muscles of symptom‐free subjects

Isselée, Hans, De Laat, Antoon, Lesaffre, Emmanuel, Lysens, Roeland·1997·European Journal of Oral Sciences

Abstract

Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles were assessed over a single day and in between 2 days with the aid of an electronic algometer in 11 males and 11 females. Using a mixed model approach, covariance results were controlled for confounding of gender, day, time of the day and the within-session replications of the measurements. For every jaw muscle, the first PPT measurement of a session was markedly higher than the last one of that same session. Except for the right temporalis muscles, no significant systematic PPT differences could be observed between male and female subjects. The differences between morning and afternoon sessions were not significant for any of the muscles tested. Although the PPTs measured on the 1st day were systematically lower than those on the 2nd day for the left masseter and temporalis muscles, no significant difference between the time of the day could be observed when the values of the different muscles were grouped within a subject. Analysis of variance showed that the variability induced by the day or the time of the day was similar to the variability of the measurement itself. The inter-individual variability of PPTs was 2.3 to 9 x higher than the variability observed between trials, sessions or days. The results indicate that the PPT measurement will not be systematically influenced by the time of registration (morning/afternoon) or inbetween consecutive days. In addition, the important inter-individu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00221.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isselée, H., De Laat, A., Lesaffre, E., & Lysens, R.
Affiliations
  • Saint John's Hospital (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
European Journal of Oral Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-12
Volume
105
Issue
6
Pages
583-587
ISSN
  • 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
  • 0909-8836
  • 1600-0722
OpenAlex
W2067844320
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal Of Oral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
pressure pain threshold, masseter muscle, temporalis muscle, masticatory muscles, reproducibility, measurement variability, interindividual variability, time of day effects, day-to-day variability, sex differences, within-subjects design
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Circadian Rhythm, Electronics, Medical, Facial Pain, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Masseter Muscle, Pain, Pressure, Sex Factors, Temporal Muscle, Thumb, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Single-Blind Method, Pain Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review