Cited by 42Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsEthics in Clinical Research

Randomized controlled trials: what are they and who needs them?

Pihlstrom, Bruce L., Curran, Alice E., Voelker, Helen T., Kingman, Albert·2012·Periodontology 2000

Abstract

Dentistry is rapidly entering a new era of evidence‐based practice, and society is demanding prevention and treatment that has been proven to be effective in terms of meaningful health outcomes. Practitioners, individual patients and the public need randomized controlled trials because they provide the highest level of scientific evidence to change clinical practice and inform public health policy. Well‐designed randomized controlled trials are conceptually simple but deceptively complex to design, implement and translate into clinical practice. Randomized controlled trials are fundamentally different from observational clinical research because they randomly assign volunteers to receive test or control interventions, they are prospective and the success of the test intervention is based on a meaningful clinical outcome that is specified before the trial begins. To be successful, randomized controlled trials must be carefully designed and powered to answer a specific question that will be generalizable to the population under study. Randomized controlled trials can be designed to evaluate efficacy, effectiveness, superiority, equivalence or noninferiority. Prominent issues and challenges in designing and conducting randomized controlled trials include carefully defining enrollment criteria, establishing an organizational infrastructure, use of a data‐coordinating center, developing a manual of procedures, obtaining informed consent, recruiting and ensuring the safety of volunteer subjects, ensuring data quality, analysis and publication of trial outcomes, and translating results into clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00439.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Achieving translation of study results, particularly those of RCTs, into clinical practice by the biomedical community is necessary to enhance the quality of patient care.

    “Achieving this necessitates the translation of study results, particularly those of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), into clinical practice by the biomedical community [1, 2].”
  • Well-planned, well-executed, and well-reported RCTs, which embrace transparent and open science practices, enhance the likelihood that results are accurate, reliable, and applicable.

    “Well-planned, well-executed, and well-reported RCTs, which embrace transparent and open science practices, enhance the likelihood that results are accurate, reliable, and applicable [2, 3].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 42

Authors
Pihlstrom, B. L., Curran, A. E., Voelker, H. T., & Kingman, A.
Venue
Periodontology 2000
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
14-31
ISSN
  • 0906-6713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0757
OpenAlex
W1607222848
Cited by
42
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Periodontology 2000 (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
randomized controlled trials, evidence-based dentistry, clinical trial design, trial power, efficacy and effectiveness, non-inferiority, data coordinating center, informed consent, trial recruitment, data quality, clinical translation, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Dental Care, Humans, Informed Consent, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Dental Research, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review