Randomized controlled trials: what are they and who needs them?
Abstract
Dentistry is rapidly entering a new era of evidence‐based practice, and society is demanding prevention and treatment that has been proven to be effective in terms of meaningful health outcomes. Practitioners, individual patients and the public need randomized controlled trials because they provide the highest level of scientific evidence to change clinical practice and inform public health policy. Well‐designed randomized controlled trials are conceptually simple but deceptively complex to design, implement and translate into clinical practice. Randomized controlled trials are fundamentally different from observational clinical research because they randomly assign volunteers to receive test or control interventions, they are prospective and the success of the test intervention is based on a meaningful clinical outcome that is specified before the trial begins. To be successful, randomized controlled trials must be carefully designed and powered to answer a specific question that will be generalizable to the population under study. Randomized controlled trials can be designed to evaluate efficacy, effectiveness, superiority, equivalence or noninferiority. Prominent issues and challenges in designing and conducting randomized controlled trials include carefully defining enrollment criteria, establishing an organizational infrastructure, use of a data‐coordinating center, developing a manual of procedures, obtaining informed consent, recruiting and ensuring the safety of volunteer subjects, ensuring data quality, analysis and publication of trial outcomes, and translating results into clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Achieving translation of study results, particularly those of RCTs, into clinical practice by the biomedical community is necessary to enhance the quality of patient care.
“Achieving this necessitates the translation of study results, particularly those of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), into clinical practice by the biomedical community [1, 2].”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Well-planned, well-executed, and well-reported RCTs, which embrace transparent and open science practices, enhance the likelihood that results are accurate, reliable, and applicable.
“Well-planned, well-executed, and well-reported RCTs, which embrace transparent and open science practices, enhance the likelihood that results are accurate, reliable, and applicable [2, 3].”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Pihlstrom, B. L., Curran, A. E., Voelker, H. T., & Kingman, A.
- ORCID
- Pihlstrom, Bruce L.
- Venue
- Periodontology 2000
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-17
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-31
- ISSN
- 0906-6713 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0757
- OpenAlex
- W1607222848
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Periodontology 2000 (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trials, evidence-based dentistry, clinical trial design, trial power, efficacy and effectiveness, non-inferiority, data coordinating center, informed consent, trial recruitment, data quality, clinical translation, clinical outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Dental Care, Humans, Informed Consent, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Dental Research, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review