The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skyscraper running: physiological and biomechanical profile of a novel sport activity
Abstract
Skyscraper running is here analyzed in terms of mechanical and metabolic requirements, both at the general and at the individual level. Skyscraper runners' metabolic profile has been inferred from the total mechanical power estimated in 36 world records (48–421 m tall buildings), ranked by gender and age range. Individual athlete's performance (n=13) has been experimentally investigated during the Pirelli Vertical Sprint, with data loggers for altitude and heart rate (HR). At a general level, a non‐linear regression of Wilkie's model relating maximal mechanical power to event duration revealed the gender and age differences in terms of maximum aerobic power and anaerobic energy resources particularly needed at the beginning of the race. The total mechanical power was found to be partitioned among: the fraction devolved to raise the body center of mass , the need to accelerate the limbs with respect to the body , and running in turns between flights of stairs . At the individual level, experiments revealed that these athletes show a metabolic profile similar to middle‐distance runners. Furthermore, best skyscraper runners maintain a constant vertical speed and HR throughout the race, while others suddenly decelerate, negatively affecting the race performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has to be remembered that 1 m radius refers to the distance of the pivot from where the feet were placed; actually, the 'effective' turn of the body centre of mass occurred at a radius of 0.72-0.84m.”
From Update and extension of the ‘Equivalent Slope’ of speed changing level locomotion in humans: a computational model for shuttle running (2018) · cites this paper as Minetti et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“To the authors' knowledge, the smallest investigated turn radius is 1 m (Minetti et al., 2011).”
From Update and extension of the ‘Equivalent Slope’ of speed changing level locomotion in humans: a computational model for shuttle running (2018) · cites this paper as Minetti et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“The metabolic cost of running along that circle was found to be almost speed independent, and equal to 283.1±64.1 ml O 2 kg -1 km -1 , or 5.78±1.31J kg -1 m -1 .”
From Update and extension of the ‘Equivalent Slope’ of speed changing level locomotion in humans: a computational model for shuttle running (2018) · cites this paper as Minetti et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes
Saltin, B., & Astrand, P. O. (1967) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1967.23.3.353 · Cited by 798 · cited 1×
“…resting [1.67 metabolic kW or 71.4mlO2/(kgmin)] for an assumed body mass of 67 kg, in agreement with typical values of middle-distance runners (Saltin & Astrand, 1967) and the anaerobic capacity (92 metabolic kJ, equivalent to 66mlO2/kg, a reasonable value indeed for elite athletes),…”
BackgroundInfluentialTanaka, H., & Seals, D. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00320.2003 · Cited by 275
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011866 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00607.2004 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01179.2003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-003-0926-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpregu.00537.2007 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90458-5 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0028-1104591 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00845.x · DOI
- Margaria R, 1966, Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man, J Appl Physiol, 21, 1662, 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.5.1662 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90282-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00038-4 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.00886 · DOI
- Minetti AE, 1994, Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running, J Exp Biol, 195, 211, 10.1242/jeb.195.1.211 · DOI · Paper page
- O'Connel ER, 1986, Energy costs of simulated stair climbing as a job‐related task in fire fighting, J Occup Med, 28, 282
- Sabapathy S, 2004, Oxygen uptake kinetics during severe exercise, a comparison between young and older men, 139, 203
- 10.1097/00005768-200204000-00021 · DOI
- Wilkie DR., 1980, Exercise bioenergetics and gas exchange, 75
- 10.1002/jor.1100150306 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Minetti, A. E., & Pavei, G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.182303 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Minetti, A. E., Cazzola, D., Seminati, E., Giacometti, M., & Roi, G. S.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-301
- ISSN
- 0905-7188
- 1600-0838
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review