The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential safety issues with blood flow restriction training
Abstract
The focal point of previous literature was establishing the efficacy of blood flow restriction training with respect to muscular strength, muscular hypertrophy, and muscular endurance. After mounting evidence supporting the efficacy of low‐intensity blood flow restriction training, research has shifted to the overall safety of this training modality. The aim of this review was to summarize the research on the overall safety of blood flow restriction training, focusing on the cardiovascular system (central and peripheral), muscle damage, oxidative stress, and nerve conduction velocity responses compared with those observed with regular exercise. Although still sparse, the blood flow restriction training research thus far is promising with respect to safety outcomes. Individuals respond similarly to blood flow restriction training and to regular exercise; however, longer term studies are required to better understand the chronic effects of low‐intensity blood flow restriction training and possible safety issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Free radicals in biology and medicine
(1991) · General Pharmacology: The Vascular System · doi:10.1016/0306-3623(91)90478-o · Cited by 17,178
Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine
Halliwell, B., & Gutteridge, J. M. C. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717478.001.0001 · Cited by 8,990
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Humans
Clarkson, P. M., & Hubal, M. J. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00002060-200211001-00007 · Cited by 1,462
Neural adaptation to resistance training
SALE, D. G. (1988) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-198810001-00009 · Cited by 1,421
Arterial blood pressure response to heavy resistance exercise
MacDougall, J. D., Tuxen, D., Sale, D. G., Moroz, J. R., & Sutton, J. R. (1985) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1985.58.3.785 · Cited by 959
Measurement Tools Used in the Study of Eccentric Contraction???Induced Injury
Warren, G. L., Lowe, D. A., & Armstrong, R. B. (1999) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199927010-00004 · Cited by 806
Takarada, Y., Nakamura, Y., Aruga, S., Onda, T., Miyazaki, S., & Ishii, N. (2000) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.88.1.61 · Cited by 706
Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001 · Cited by 661
Abe, T., Kearns, C. F., & Sato, Y. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01267.2005 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Centner, C., Wiegel, P., Gollhofer, A., & König, D. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0994-1 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Loenneke, J. P., Wilson, J. M., Wilson, G. J., Pujol, T. J., & Bemben, M. G.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-518
- ISSN
- 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0838
- OpenAlex
- W1554012182
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential safety issues with blood flow restriction training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x
- The paper
- Loenneke, J. P., Wilson, J. M., Wilson, G. J., Pujol, T. J., & Bemben, M. G. (2011). Potential safety issues with blood flow restriction training. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
