Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses

Aagaard, Per, Simonsen, Erik B., Andersen, Jesper L., Magnusson, Peter, Dyhre-Poulsen, Poul·2002·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Combined V-wave and Hoffmann (H) reflex measurements were performed during maximal muscle contraction to examine the neural adaptation mechanisms induced by resistance training. The H-reflex can be used to assess the excitability of spinal α-motoneurons, while also reflecting transmission efficiency (i.e., presynaptic inhibition) in Ia afferent synapses. Furthermore, the V-wave reflects the overall magnitude of efferent motor output from the α-motoneuron pool because of activation from descending central pathways. Fourteen male subjects participated in 14 wk of resistance training that involved heavy weight-lifting exercises for the muscles of the leg. Evoked V-wave, H-reflex, and maximal M-wave (M max) responses were recorded before and after training in the soleus muscle during maximal isometric ramp contractions. Maximal isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle strength was measured by use of isokinetic dynamometry. V-wave amplitude increased ∼50% with training ( P < 0.01) from 3.19 ± 0.43 to 4.86 ± 0.43 mV, or from 0.308 ± 0.048 to 0.478 ± 0.034 when expressed relative to M max (± SE). H-reflex amplitude increased ∼20% ( P < 0.05) from 5.37 ± 0.41 to 6.24 ± 0.49 mV, or from 0.514 ± 0.032 to 0.609 ± 0.025 when normalized to M max. In contrast, resting H-reflex amplitude remained unchanged with training (0.503 ± 0.059 vs. 0.499 ± 0.063). Likewise, no change occurred in M max (10.78 ± 0.86 vs. 10.21 ± 0.66 mV). Maximal muscle strength increased 23–30% ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, increases in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses were observed during maximal muscle contraction after resistance training. Collectively, the present data suggest that the increase in motoneuronal output induced by resistance training may comprise both supraspinal and spinal adaptation mechanisms (i.e., increased central motor drive, elevated motoneuron excitability, reduced presynaptic inhibition).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 661

Metadata

Authors
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
2309-2318
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2156321091
Cited by
661
References
3
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001
The paper
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.