The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes
Open accessAbstract
Background: Malignant melanoma has a good prognosis if treated early. Dermoscopy images of pigmented lesions are most commonly taken at × 10 magnification under lighting at a low angle of incidence while the skin is immersed in oil under a glass plate. Accurate skin lesion segmentation from the background skin is important because some of the features anticipated to be used for diagnosis deal with shape of the lesion and others deal with the color of the lesion compared with the color of the surrounding skin. Methods: In this research, gradient vector flow (GVF) snakes are investigated to find the border of skin lesions in dermoscopy images. An automatic initialization method is introduced to make the skin lesion border determination process fully automated. Results: Skin lesion segmentation results are presented for 70 benign and 30 melanoma skin lesion images for the GVF‐based method and a color histogram analysis technique. The average errors obtained by the GVF‐based method are lower for both the benign and melanoma image sets than for the color histogram analysis technique based on comparison with manually segmented lesions determined by a dermatologist. Conclusions: The experimental results for the GVF‐based method demonstrate promise as an automated technique for skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopy images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow
Xu, C., & Prince, J. L. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.661186 · Cited by 4,001
Cited by
Comparison of Segmentation Methods for Melanoma Diagnosis in Dermoscopy Images
Silveira, M., Nascimento, J. C., Marques, J. S., Marcal, A. R. S., Mendonca, T., Yamauchi, S., Maeda, J., & Rozeira, J. (2009) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2008.2011119 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Erkol, B., Moss, R. H., Joe Stanley, R., Stoecker, W. V., & Hvatum, E.
- Venue
- Skin Research and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-26
- ISSN
- 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0846
- OpenAlex
- W2028140761
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00092.x
- The paper
- Erkol, B., Moss, R. H., Joe Stanley, R., Stoecker, W. V., & Hvatum, E. (2005). Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes. Skin Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00092.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.