Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes

Open access
Erkol, Bulent, Moss, Randy H., Joe Stanley, R., Stoecker, William V., Hvatum, Erik·2005·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

Background: Malignant melanoma has a good prognosis if treated early. Dermoscopy images of pigmented lesions are most commonly taken at × 10 magnification under lighting at a low angle of incidence while the skin is immersed in oil under a glass plate. Accurate skin lesion segmentation from the background skin is important because some of the features anticipated to be used for diagnosis deal with shape of the lesion and others deal with the color of the lesion compared with the color of the surrounding skin. Methods: In this research, gradient vector flow (GVF) snakes are investigated to find the border of skin lesions in dermoscopy images. An automatic initialization method is introduced to make the skin lesion border determination process fully automated. Results: Skin lesion segmentation results are presented for 70 benign and 30 melanoma skin lesion images for the GVF‐based method and a color histogram analysis technique. The average errors obtained by the GVF‐based method are lower for both the benign and melanoma image sets than for the color histogram analysis technique based on comparison with manually segmented lesions determined by a dermatologist. Conclusions: The experimental results for the GVF‐based method demonstrate promise as an automated technique for skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopy images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00092.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Erkol, B., Moss, R. H., Joe Stanley, R., Stoecker, W. V., & Hvatum, E.
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2028140761
Cited by
233
References
2
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00092.x
The paper
Erkol, B., Moss, R. H., Joe Stanley, R., Stoecker, W. V., & Hvatum, E. (2005). Automatic lesion boundary detection in dermoscopy images using gradient vector flow snakes. Skin Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00092.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.