The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the Tendency of Fluorescent Proteins to Oligomerize Under Physiologic Conditions
Open accessAbstract
Several fluorescent proteins (FPs) are prone to forming low‐affinity oligomers. This undesirable tendency is exacerbated when FPs are confined to membranes or when fused to naturally oligomeric proteins. Oligomerization of FPs limits their suitability for creating fusions with proteins of interest. Unfortunately, no standardized method evaluates the biologically relevant oligomeric state of FPs. Here, we describe a quantitative visual assay for assessing whether FPs are sufficiently monomeric under physiologic conditions. Membrane‐associated FP‐fusion proteins, by virtue of their constrained planar geometry, achieve high effective concentrations. We exploited this propensity to develop an assay to measure FP tendencies to oligomerize in cells. FPs were fused on the cytoplasmic end of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) signal‐anchor membrane protein (CytERM) and expressed in cells. Cells were scored based on the ability of CytERM to homo‐oligomerize with proteins on apposing membranes and restructure the ER from a tubular network into organized smooth ER (OSER) whorl structures. The ratio of nuclear envelope and OSER structures mean fluorescent intensities for cells expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or monomeric green fluorescent protein (mGFP) CytERM established standards for comparison of uncharacterized FPs. We tested three FPs and identified two as sufficiently monomeric, while a third previously reported as monomeric was found to strongly oligomerize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging
Bindels, D. S., Haarbosch, L., van Weeren, L., Postma, M., Wiese, K. E., Mastop, M., Aumonier, S., Gotthard, G., Royant, A., Hink, M. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4074 · Cited by 1,156
Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy
Martell, J. D., Deerinck, T. J., Sancak, Y., Poulos, T. L., Mootha, V. K., Sosinsky, G. E., Ellisman, M. H., & Ting, A. Y. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2375 · Cited by 722
Physicochemical Properties of Cells and Their Effects on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs)
Theillet, F.-X., Binolfi, A., Frembgen-Kesner, T., Hingorani, K., Sarkar, M., Kyne, C., Li, C., Crowley, P. B., Gierasch, L., Pielak, G. J., et al. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400695p · Cited by 503
Intracellular mRNA transport and localized translation
Das, S., Vera, M., Gandin, V., Singer, R. H., & Tutucci, E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00356-8 · Cited by 382
Acid-Tolerant Monomeric GFP from Olindias formosa
Shinoda, H., Ma, Y., Nakashima, R., Sakurai, K., Matsuda, T., & Nagai, T. (2018) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.005 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Costantini, L. M., Fossati, M., Francolini, M., & Snapp, E. L.
- Venue
- Traffic
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 643-649
- ISSN
- 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0854
- OpenAlex
- W1828400526
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Tendency of Fluorescent Proteins to Oligomerize Under Physiologic Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01336.x
- The paper
- Costantini, L. M., Fossati, M., Francolini, M., & Snapp, E. L. (2012). Assessing the Tendency of Fluorescent Proteins to Oligomerize Under Physiologic Conditions. Traffic. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01336.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.