The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies
Open accessAbstract
Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n=237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n=256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post-transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 micromol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 micromol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough <3 ng/mL. There were no significant between-group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between-group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration-controlled everolimus with low-exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Silva Jr., H. T., Cibrik, D., Johnston, T., Lackova, E., Mange, K., Panis, C., Walker, R., Wang, Z., Zibari, G., & Kim, Y. S. (2010) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03129.x · Cited by 269
Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients
Webster, A. C., Ruster, L. P., McGee, R. G., Matheson, S. L., Higgins, G. Y., Willis, N. S., Chapman, J. R., & Craig, J. C. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003897.pub3 · Cited by 268
Nelson, J., Alvey, N., Bowman, L., Schulte, J., Segovia, M. C., McDermott, J., Te, H. S., Kapila, N., Levine, D. J., Gottlieb, R. L., et al. (2022) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2716 · Cited by 130
Cheung, Y.-M. M., McDonnell, M., & Hamnvik, O.-P. R. (2022) · Current Problems in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100776 · Cited by 21
Kim, H. D., Chang, J.-Y., Chung, B. H., Kim, C.-D., Lee, S.-H., Kim, Y. H., & Yang, C. W. (2021) · Annals of Transplantation · doi:10.12659/aot.927984 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitko, S., Tedesco, H., Eris, J., Pascual, J., Whelchel, J., Magee, J. C., Campbell, S., Civati, G., Bourbigot, B., Filho, G. A., Leone, J., Garcia, V. D., Rigotti, P., Esmeraldo, R., Cambi, V., Haas, T., Jappe, A., Bernhardt, P., Geissler, J., & Cretin, N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 626-635
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107218339
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00389.x
- The paper
- Vitko, S., Tedesco, H., Eris, J., Pascual, J., Whelchel, J., Magee, J. C., Campbell, S., Civati, G., Bourbigot, B., Filho, G. A., Leone, J., Garcia, V. D., Rigotti, P., Esmeraldo, R., Cambi, V., Haas, T., Jappe, A., Bernhardt, P., Geissler, J., & Cretin, N. (2004). Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00389.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.