Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies

Open access
Vitko, Stefan, Tedesco, Helio, Eris, Josette, Pascual, Julio, Whelchel, John, Magee, John C., Campbell, Scott, Civati, Giovanni, Bourbigot, Bernard, Filho, Gentil Alves, Leone, John, Garcia, Valter Duro, Rigotti, Paolo, Esmeraldo, Ronaldo, Cambi, Vincenzo, Haas, Tomas, Jappe, Annette, Bernhardt, Peter, Geissler, Johanna, Cretin, Nathalie·2004·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n=237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n=256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post-transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 micromol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 micromol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough <3 ng/mL. There were no significant between-group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between-group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration-controlled everolimus with low-exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00389.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Vitko, S., Tedesco, H., Eris, J., Pascual, J., Whelchel, J., Magee, J. C., Campbell, S., Civati, G., Bourbigot, B., Filho, G. A., Leone, J., Garcia, V. D., Rigotti, P., Esmeraldo, R., Cambi, V., Haas, T., Jappe, A., Bernhardt, P., Geissler, J., & Cretin, N.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
626-635
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107218339
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00389.x
The paper
Vitko, S., Tedesco, H., Eris, J., Pascual, J., Whelchel, J., Magee, J. C., Campbell, S., Civati, G., Bourbigot, B., Filho, G. A., Leone, J., Garcia, V. D., Rigotti, P., Esmeraldo, R., Cambi, V., Haas, T., Jappe, A., Bernhardt, P., Geissler, J., & Cretin, N. (2004). Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00389.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.