The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Previous reports of cancer after kidney transplantation have been limited by small numbers of patients in single-center studies and incomplete ascertainment of cases in large registries. We examined rates of malignancies among first-time recipients of deceased or living donor kidney transplantations in 1995-2001 (n = 35 765) using Medicare billing claims. For most common tumors, e.g. colon, lung, prostate, stomach, esophagus, pancreas, ovary and breast, cancer rates were roughly twofold higher after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Melanoma, leukemia, hepatobiliary tumors, cervical and vulvovaginal tumors were each approximately fivefold more common. Testicular and bladder cancers were increased approximately threefold, while kidney cancer was approximately 15-fold more common. Kaposi's sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, and nonmelanoma skin cancers were more than 20-fold increased than in the general population. Compared with patients on the waiting list, several tumors were more common after transplantation (p < 0.01): nonmelanoma skin cancers (2.6-fold), melanoma (2.2-fold), Kaposi's sarcoma (9.0-fold), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (3.3-fold), cancer of the mouth (2.2-fold), and cancer of the kidney (39% higher). The rates for most malignancies are higher after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Cancer should continue to be a major focus of prevention in kidney transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00011 · Cited by 456
Identifying Persons with Diabetes Using Medicare Claims Data
Hebert, P. L., Geiss, L. S., Tierney, E. F., Engelgau, M. M., Yawn, B. P., & McBean, A. M. (1999) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/106286069901400607 · Cited by 403
Cited by
Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients
Engels, E. A., Pfeiffer, R. M., Fraumeni, J. F., Kasiske, B. L., Israni, A. K., Snyder, J. J., Wolfe, R. A., Goodrich, N. P., Bayakly, A. R., Clarke, C. A., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1592 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationImmunosuppressive Drugs and the Risk of Cancer after Organ Transplantation
Dantal, J., & Soulillou, J.-P. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme058018 · Cited by 256
The role of IL-11 in immunity and cancer
Xu, D. H., Zhu, Z., Wakefield, M. R., Xiao, H., Bai, Q., & Fang, Y. (2016) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.004 · Cited by 134
Willey, A., Mehta, S., & Lee, P. K. (2010) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01384.x · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasiske, B. L., Snyder, J. J., Gilbertson, D. T., & Wang, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 905-913
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146662658
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00450.x
- The paper
- Kasiske, B. L., Snyder, J. J., Gilbertson, D. T., & Wang, C. (2004). Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00450.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.