Cited by 124Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesSkin Protection and Aging

Reduction in the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients treated with cyclic photodynamic therapy

Willey, Andrea, Mehta, Sheetal, Lee, Peter K.·2010·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) produce significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), particularly in patients who develop multiple tumors. Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to decrease the number of keratotic lesions in SOTRs, but the duration of the beneficial effect is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of cyclic PDT in the prevention of new SCCs in SOTRs. METHODS: Twelve high-risk SOTRs received cyclic PDT treatments at 4- to 8-week intervals for 2 years. The development of new SCCs (invasive and in situ) performed 12 and 24 months after the start of cyclic PDT were compared with the number of SCCs developed during the year before initiation of cyclic PDT. RESULTS: The median reduction in the 12- and 24-month post-treatment counts from the 1-month pretreatment counts was 79.0% (73.3-81.8%) and 95.0% (87.5-100.0%), respectively. Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Cyclic PDT with 5-aminolevulinic acid may reduce the incidence of SCC in SOTRs. Additional studies with larger numbers of patients and optimized protocols are necessary to further explore the potential benefits of cyclic PDT in the prevention of skin cancer in this high-risk patient population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01384.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Willey et al. carried out cyclic ALA/PDT on twelve solid organ transplant recipients and found a 95% mean reduction in SCC lesion count at 24 months post-treatment, compared to 1 month pre-treatment.

    “There was a 95% mean reduction in SCC lesion count at 24 months post-treatment, compared to 1 month pre-treatment [60].”

    From Photodynamic Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers (2016) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willey, A., Mehta, S., & Lee, P. K.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Willey, Andrea
  • Mehta, Sheetal
  • Lee, Peter K.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2010-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
652-658
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979397247
Cited by
124
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
squamous cell carcinoma, solid organ transplant recipients, 5-aminolevulinic acid, skin cancer prevention, multiple primary neoplasms, keratotic lesions, Bowen's disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aminolevulinic Acid, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Photochemotherapy, Pilot Projects, Primary Prevention, Prospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, Incidence, Organ Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Photosensitizing Agents, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review