The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Conference to Assess Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
The process of humoral rejection is multifaceted and has different manifestations in the various types of organ transplants. Because this process is emerging as a leading cause of graft loss, a conference was held in April 2003 to comprehensively address issues regarding humoral rejection. Though humoral rejection may result from different factors, discussion focused on a paradigm caused by antibodies, typically against donor HLA antigens, leading to the term 'antibody-mediated rejection' (AMR). Conference deliberations were separated into four workgroups: The Profiling Workgroup evaluated strengths and limitations of different methods for detecting HLA reactive antibody, and created risk assessment guidelines for AMR; The Diagnosis Workgroup reviewed clinical, pathologic, and serologic criteria for assessing AMR in renal, heart and lung transplant recipients; The Treatment Workgroup discussed advantages, limitations and possible mechanisms of action for desensitization protocols that may reverse AMR; and The Basic Science Workgroup presented animal and human immunologic models for humoral rejection and proposed potential targets for future intervention. This work represents a comprehensive review with contributions from experts in the fields of Transplantation Surgery, Medicine, Pathology, Histocompatibility, Immunology, and clinical trial design. Immunologic barriers once considered insurmountable are now consistently overcome to enable more patients to undergo organ transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Solez, K., Colvin, R., Racusen, L., Sis, B., Halloran, P., Birk, P., Campbell, P., Cascalho, M., Collins, A., Demetris, A., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01688.x · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationSzczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.20240 · Cited by 508
Muduma, G., Odeyemi, I., Smith-Palmer, J., & Pollock, R. F. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Takemoto, S. K., Zeevi, A., Feng, S., Colvin, R. B., Jordan, S., Kobashigawa, J., Kupiec-Weglinski, J., Matas, A., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Platt, J. L., Rabb, H., Thistlethwaite, R., Tyan, D., & Delmonico, F. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1033-1041
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021005241
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Conference to Assess Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00500.x
- The paper
- Takemoto, S. K., Zeevi, A., Feng, S., Colvin, R. B., Jordan, S., Kobashigawa, J., Kupiec-Weglinski, J., Matas, A., Montgomery, R. A., Nickerson, P., Platt, J. L., Rabb, H., Thistlethwaite, R., Tyan, D., & Delmonico, F. L. (2004). National Conference to Assess Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00500.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.