Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Pre-Operative Loco-Regional Therapy on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Open access
Yao, Francis Y., Kinkhabwala, Milan, LaBerge, Jeanne M., Bass, Nathan M., Brown, Robert, Kerlen, Robert, Venook, Alan, Ascher, Nancy L., Emond, Jean C., Roberts, John P.·2005·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

No prior studies have shown that pre-operative loco-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improves survival following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We performed subgroup analyses according to pathologic HCC stage among 168 patients who underwent OLT to test the hypothesis that pre-operative loco-regional therapy confers a survival advantage in a subgroup at intermediate risk for HCC recurrence. Patients with pathologic T3 HCC meeting the proposed UCSF expanded criteria (single lesion not exceeding 6.5 cm or two to three lesions none > 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter within 8 cm) had a similar 5-year recurrence-free survival as patients with pathologic T2 HCC (88.5% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.56). In the subgroup with pathologic T2 or T3 HCC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 93.8% for the 85 patients who received pre-operative loco-regional therapy, versus 80.6% for the other 41 patients without treatment (p = 0.049). The treatment benefit, according to 5-year recurrence-free survival, appeared greater for pathologic T3 (85.9% vs. 51.4%; p = 0.05) than T2 HCC (96.4% versus 87.1%; p = 0.12). In conclusion, although the lack of a randomized controlled design precludes drawing firm conclusions, our results suggest that pre-operative loco-regional therapy may confer a survival benefit after OLT in the subgroup with pathologic T2 and T3 HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00750.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Yao, F. Y., Kinkhabwala, M., LaBerge, J. M., Bass, N. M., Brown, R., Kerlen, R., Venook, A., Ascher, N. L., Emond, J. C., & Roberts, J. P.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
795-804
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992131464
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Pre-Operative Loco-Regional Therapy on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00750.x
The paper
Yao, F. Y., Kinkhabwala, M., LaBerge, J. M., Bass, N. M., Brown, R., Kerlen, R., Venook, A., Ascher, N. L., Emond, J. C., & Roberts, J. P. (2005). The Impact of Pre-Operative Loco-Regional Therapy on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00750.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.