Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation

Open access
Yao, Francis Y., Hirose, Ryutaro, LaBerge, Jeanne M., Davern, Timothy J., Bass, Nathan M., Kerlan, Robert K., Merriman, Raphael, Feng, Sandy, Freise, Chris E., Ascher, Nancy L., Roberts, John P.·2005·Liver Transplantation

Abstract

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding conventional (T2) criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the feasibility and outcome following loco-regional therapy intended for tumor downstaging to meet T2 criteria for OLT are unknown. In this first prospective study on downstaging of HCC prior to OLT, the eligibility criteria for enrollment into a downstaging protocol included 1 lesion >5 cm and ≤8 cm, 2 or 3 lesions at least 1 >3 cm but ≤5 cm with total tumor diameter of ≤8 cm, or 4 or 5 nodules all ≤3 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm. Patients were eligible for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) if tumors were downstaged to within proposed University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria. 13 A minimum follow-up period of 3 months after downstaging was required before cadaveric OLT or LDLT, with imaging studies meeting criteria for successful downstaging. Among the 30 patients enrolled, 21 (70%) met criteria for successful downstaging, including 16 (53%) who had subsequently received OLT (2 with LDLT), and 9 patients (30%) were classified as treatment failures. In the explant of 16 patients who underwent OLT, 7 had complete tumor necrosis, 7 met T2 criteria, but 2 exceeded T2 criteria. No HCC recurrence was observed after a median follow-up of 16 months after OLT. The Kaplan-Meier intention-to-treat survival was 89.3 and 81.8% at 1 and 2 yr, respectively. In conclusion, successful tumor downstaging can be achieved in the majority of carefully selected patients, but longer follow-up is needed to further access the risk of HCC recurrence after OLT. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:1505–1514.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lt.20526

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Yao, F. Y., Hirose, R., LaBerge, J. M., Davern, T. J., Bass, N. M., Kerlan, R. K., Merriman, R., Feng, S., Freise, C. E., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P.
Venue
Liver Transplantation
Published
2005-12
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
1505-1514
ISSN
1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044018537
Cited by
288
References
27
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lt.20526
The paper
Yao, F. Y., Hirose, R., LaBerge, J. M., Davern, T. J., Bass, N. M., Kerlan, R. K., Merriman, R., Feng, S., Freise, C. E., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P. (2005). A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20526

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.