The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The ‘ReSpECT’ Study
Open accessAbstract
We report a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating the effect of lower levels and delayed introduction of tacrolimus on renal function in liver transplant recipients. Adult patients with good renal function undergoing primary liver transplant were randomized to either: group A (standard-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels >10 ng/mL] and corticosteroids; n = 183); group B (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] 2g/day, reduced-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels </=8 ng/mL], and corticosteroids; n = 170); group C (daclizumab induction, MMF, reduced-dose tacrolimus delayed until the fifth day posttransplant and corticosteroids, n = 172). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 52 weeks. The eGFR decreased by 23.61, 21.22 and 13.63 mL/min in groups A, B and C, respectively (A vs C, p = 0.012; A vs B, p = 0.199). Renal dialysis was required less frequently in group C versus group A (4.2% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.037). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 27.6%, 29.2% and 19.0%, respectively. Patient and graft survival was similar. In conclusion, daclizumab induction, MMF, corticosteroids and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus was associated with less nephrotoxicity than therapy with standard-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids without compromising efficacy or tolerability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levey, A. S., Bosch, J. P., Lewis, J. B., Greene, T., Rogers, N., Roth, D., & for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group* (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 · Cited by 15,079
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.006 · Cited by 1,082
Lucey, M. R., Terrault, N., Ojo, L., Hay, E. J., Neuberger, J., Blumberg, E., & Teperman, L. W. (2013) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.23566 · Cited by 544
Self-citationToso, C., Merani, S., Bigam, D. L., Shapiro, A. M. J., & Kneteman, N. M. (2010) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.23437 · Cited by 329
Goralczyk, A. D., Hauke, N., Bari, N., Y. Tsui, T., Lorf, T., & Obed, A. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24385 · Cited by 72
Kim, D.-S., Yoon, Y.-I., Kim, B. K., Choudhury, A., Kulkarni, A., Park, J. Y., Kim, J., Sinn, D. H., Joo, D. J., Choi, Y., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuberger, J. M., Mamelok, R. D., Neuhaus, P., Pirenne, J., Samuel, D., Isoniemi, H., Rostaing, L., Rimola, A., Marshall, S., & Mayer, A. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-336
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093725163
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The ‘ReSpECT’ Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02493.x
- The paper
- Neuberger, J. M., Mamelok, R. D., Neuhaus, P., Pirenne, J., Samuel, D., Isoniemi, H., Rostaing, L., Rimola, A., Marshall, S., & Mayer, A. D. (2009). Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The ‘ReSpECT’ Study. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02493.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.