The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preformed and De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies in Visceral Transplantation: Long-Term Outcome With Special Reference to the Liver
Open accessAbstract
Despite improvement in early outcome, rejection particularly chronic allograft enteropathy continues to be a major barrier to long-term visceral engraftment. The potential role of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in 194 primary adult recipients. All underwent complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM) with pre- and posttransplant solid phase HLA-DSA assay in 156 (80%). Grafts were ABO-identical with random HLA-match. Liver was included in 71 (37%) allografts. Immunosuppression was tacrolimus-based with antilymphocyte recipient pretreatment in 150 (77%). CDC-XM was positive in 55 (28%). HLA-DSA was detectable before transplant in 49 (31%) recipients with 19 continuing to have circulating antibodies. Another 19 (18%) developed de novo DSA. Ninety percent of patients with preformed DSA harbored HLA Class-I whereas 74% of recipients with de novo antibodies had Class-II. Gender, age, ABO blood-type, cold ischemia, splenectomy and allograft type were significant DSA predictors. Preformed DSA significantly (p < 0.05) increased risk of acute rejection. Persistent and de novo HLA-DSA significantly (p < 0.001) increased risk of chronic rejection and associated graft loss. Inclusion of the liver was a significant predictor of better outcome (p = 0.004, HR = 0.347) with significant clearance of preformed antibodies (p = 0.04, OR = 56) and lower induction of de novo DSA (p = 0.07, OR = 24). Innovative multifaceted anti-DSA strategies are required to further improve long-term survival particularly of liver-free allografts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Rejection: Current Perspectives
Wood, K. J., & Goto, R. (2012) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e31823cab44 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Kaneku, H., O’Leary, J. G., Banuelos, N., Jennings, L. W., Susskind, B. M., Klintmalm, G. B., & Terasaki, P. I. (2013) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12212 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu-Elmagd, K. M., Wu, G., Costa, G., Lunz, J., Martin, L., Koritsky, D. A., Murase, N., Irish, W., & Zeevi, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3047-3060
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1594127044
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preformed and De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies in Visceral Transplantation: Long-Term Outcome With Special Reference to the Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04237.x
- The paper
- Abu-Elmagd, K. M., Wu, G., Costa, G., Lunz, J., Martin, L., Koritsky, D. A., Murase, N., Irish, W., & Zeevi, A. (2012). Preformed and De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies in Visceral Transplantation: Long-Term Outcome With Special Reference to the Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04237.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.