The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions
Abstract
Debridement of the root canal by instrumentation and irrigation is considered the most important single factor in the prevention and treatment of endodontic diseases. In clinical practice, instrumentation of the root canal(s) within the affected tooth is usually the most time consuming and technically demanding element of the treatment. The technical success of the treatment, as judged by the post‐operative radiograph after the root filling, is based on optimized root canal instrumentation. Mounting evidence from epidemiological research is also indicating that the combination of high‐quality coronal restoration and technically satisfactory root canal treatment is associated with the greatest long‐term prognosis. Therefore, it is not surprising that for several decades of endodontic research, a substantial number of articles on instruments and instrumentation have been published in the scientific literature. Although interest in the effects of instrumentation on intracanal infection is not new, it is obvious that during the last few years a renewed focus of interest has appeared on the relationship between instrumentation and infection control in the root canal. The ongoing discussion in international endodontics about one‐appointment therapy in the treatment of apical periodontitis has naturally further motivated the newly emerged research activities. The goal of this review is to gather the relevant and most recent literature and provide an updated analysis of the effect of preparation (instrumentation and irrigation) on the microbial infection in the necrotic root canal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKenna, S. M., & Davies, K. J. A. (1988) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2540685 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature
Van Der Sluis, L. W. M., Versluis, M., Wu, M. K., & Wesselink, P. R. (2007) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x · Cited by 849
Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review
Kim, S. G., Malek, M., Sigurdsson, A., Lin, L. M., & Kahler, B. (2018) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/iej.12954 · Cited by 523
Shen, Y., Stojicic, S., & Haapasalo, M. (2011) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.007 · Cited by 279
Self-citationTreatment of Oral Multispecies Biofilms by an Anti-Biofilm Peptide
Wang, Z., de la Fuente-Núñez, C., Shen, Y., Haapasalo, M., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132512 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Haapasalo, M., Endal, U., Zandi, H., & Coil, J. M.
- Venue
- Endodontic Topics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-102
- ISSN
- 1601-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1601-1546
- OpenAlex
- W2150226282
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
- The paper
- Haapasalo, M., Endal, U., Zandi, H., & Coil, J. M. (2005). Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.