The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age
Abstract
Aim: To describe the methods used to construct the WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age, and to present resulting growth charts. Methods: The WHO Child Growth Standards were derived from an international sample of healthy breastfed infants and young children raised in environments that do not constrain growth. Rigorous methods of data collection and standardized procedures across study sites yielded very high‐quality data. The generation of the standards followed methodical, state‐of‐the‐art statistical methodologies. The Box‐Cox power exponential (BCPE) method, with curve smoothing by cubic splines, was used to construct the curves. The BCPE accommodates various kinds of distributions, from normal to skewed or kurtotic, as necessary. A set of diagnostic tools was used to detect possible biases in estimated percentiles or z‐score curves. Results: There was wide variability in the degrees of freedom required for the cubic splines to achieve the best model. Except for length/height‐for‐age, which followed a normal distribution, all other standards needed to model skewness but not kurtosis. Length‐for‐age and height‐for‐age standards were constructed by fitting a unique model that reflected the 0.7‐cm average difference between these two measurements. The concordance between smoothed percentile curves and empirical percentiles was excellent and free of bias. Percentiles and z‐score curves for boys and girls aged 0–60 mo were generated for weight‐for‐age, length/height‐for‐age, weight‐for‐length/height (45 to 110 cm and 65 to 120 cm, respectively) and body mass index‐for‐age. Conclusion: The WHO Child Growth Standards depict normal growth under optimal environmental conditions and can be used to assess children everywhere, regardless of ethnicity, socio‐economic status and type of feeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Cited by
Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents
de Onis, M. (2007) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.07.043497 · Cited by 8,826
Self-citationGlobal prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children
de Onis, M., Blössner, M., & Borghi, E. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29786 · Cited by 2,182
Self-citationChildhood stunting: a global perspective
de Onis, M., & Branca, F. (2016) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12231 · Cited by 1,552
Self-citationGut Microbiomes of Malawian Twin Pairs Discordant for Kwashiorkor
Smith, M. I., Yatsunenko, T., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Mkakosya, R., Cheng, J., Kau, A. L., Rich, S. S., Concannon, P., Mychaleckyj, J. C., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229000 · Cited by 1,173
The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System
Silbereis, J. C., Pochareddy, S., Zhu, Y., Li, M., & Sestan, N. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.008 · Cited by 818
Metadata
- Authors
- WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, & de Onis, M.
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- S450
- Pages
- 76-85
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-5253
- 1651-2227
- OpenAlex
- W1924064069
- Cited by
- 3,977
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.