Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones

WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, de Onis, Mercedes·2006·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim:To review the methods for generating windows of achievement for six gross motor developmental milestones and to compare the actual windows with commonly used motor development scales.Methods:As part of the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study, longitudinal data were collected to describe the attainment of six gross motor milestones by children aged 4 to 24 mo in Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the USA. Trained fieldworkers assessed 816 children at scheduled visits (monthly in year 1, bimonthly in year 2). Caretakers also recorded ages of achievement independently. Failure time models were used to construct windows of achievement for each milestone, bound by the 1st and 99th percentiles, without internal demarcations.Results:About 90% of children achieved five of the milestones following a common sequence, and 4.3% did not exhibit hands‐and‐knees crawling. The six windows have age overlaps but vary in width; the narrowest is sitting without support (5.4 mo), and the widest are walking alone (9.4 mo) and standing alone (10.0 mo). The estimated 1st and 99th percentiles in months are: 3.8, 9.2 (sitting without support), 4.8, 11.4 (standing with assistance), 5.2, 13.5 (hands‐and‐knees crawling), 5.9, 13.7 (walking with assistance), 6.9, 16.9 (standing alone) and 8.2, 17.6 (walking alone). The 95% confidence interval widths varied among milestones between 0.2 and 0.4 mo for the 1st percentile, and 0.5 and 1.0 mo for the 99th. Conclusion:The windows represent normal variation in ages of milestone achievement among healthy children. They are recommended for descriptive comparisons among populations, to signal the need for appropriate screening when individual children appear to be late in achieving the milestones, and to raise awareness about the importance of overall development in child health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02379.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, & de Onis, M.
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
95
Issue
S450
Pages
86-95
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W1903167465
Cited by
671
References
1
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02379.x
The paper
WHO MULTICENTRE GROWTH REFERENCE STUDY GROUP, & de Onis, M. (2006). WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02379.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.