Predictors and protective factors for adolescent internet victimization: Results from a 2008 nationwide Danish youth survey
Abstract
AIM: To examine the rate of Internet victimization in a nationally representative sample of adolescents aged 14-17 and to analyze predictors and protective factors for victimization. METHODS: Data were collected for 3707 pupils in Danish schools in 2008, using a multimedia computer-based self-interviewing programme. Family characteristics, alcohol and drug abuse, exposure to physical/sexual abuse, emotional problems, social conduct and own risky Internet behaviour were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Any online victimization was reported by 27% of the adolescents, most frequently a rumour spread online (9% of boys and 15% of girls) and sexual solicitation (5% of boys and 16% of girls). Parental surveillance of adolescents' Internet use significantly reduced their risk of online victimization. Roughly half of the adolescents had met Internet acquaintances face to face, with few instances resulting in forced sex (five boys and nine girls). Female gender, parental physical violence, previous exposure to sexual abuse, alcohol abuse in the family, self-reported emotional problems and antisocial behaviour and high Internet use were all weakly and risky online behaviour strongly associated with online victimization. CONCLUSIONS: Danish adolescents are generally aware of the principles of 'safe chatting'; however, online harassment is relatively frequent, but offline victimization based on Internet acquaintances is rare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A history of offline child sexual abuse is considered a risk factor for future online victimization.
“A history of offline child sexual abuse is considered a risk factor for future victimization online (Helweg-Larsen et al., 2011;Mitchell et al., 2001;Mitchell et al., 2007;Noll, Shenk, Barnes, & Putnam, 2009;Wolak et al., 2008).”
From A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming (2013) · cites this paper as Helweg-Larsen et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Helweg‐Larsen, K., Schütt, N., & Larsen, H. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-27
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 533-539
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-5253
- 1651-2227
- OpenAlex
- W2150511773
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Keywords
- online harassment, online sexual solicitation, rumor propagation, protective factors, risk factors, emotional problems, antisocial behavior, Danish adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Harassment, Crime Victims, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review