The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistance to antimicrobial agents used for animal therapy in pathogenic‐, zoonotic‐ and indicator bacteria isolated from different food animals in Denmark: a baseline study for the Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programme (DANMAP)
Open accessAbstract
This study describes the establishment and first results of a continuous surveillance system of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria isolated from pigs, cattle and broilers in Denmark. The three categories of bacteria tested were: 1) indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium), 2) zoonotic bacteria (Campylobacter coli/jejuni, Salmonella enterica, Yersinia enterocolitica), and 3) animal pathogens (E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase‐negative staphylococci (CNS),Staphylococcus hyicus, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae). A total of 3304 bacterial isolates collected from October 1995 through December 1996 were tested for susceptibility to all major classes of antimicrobial agents used for therapy in Denmark. Bacterial species intrinsically resistant to an antimicrobial were not tested towards that antimicrobial. Acquired resistance to all antimicrobials was found. The occurrence of resistance varied by animal origin and bacterial species. In general, resistance was observed more frequently among isolates from pigs than from cattle and broilers. The association between the occurrence of resistance and the consumption of the antimicrobial is discussed, as is the occurrence of resistance in other countries. The results of this study show the present level of resistance to antimicrobial agents among a number of bacterial species isolated from food animals in Denmark. Thus, the baseline for comparison with future prospective studies has been established, enabling the determination of trends over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment
Woolhouse, M., Ward, M., van Bunnik, B., & Farrar, J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0083 · Cited by 678
van den Bogaard, A. E. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/47.6.763 · Cited by 622
Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human healt
Barton, M. D. (2000) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/095442200108729106 · Cited by 516
Veterinary use and antibiotic resistance
Teuber, M. (2001) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00241-1 · Cited by 476
Acquired antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from food
Teuber, M., Meile, L., & Schwarz, F. (1999) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1002035622988 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- AARESTRUP, F. M., BAGER, F., JENSEN, N. E., MADSEN, M., MEYLING, A., & WEGENER, H. C.
- Venue
- APMIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 7-12
- Pages
- 745-770
- ISSN
- 0903-4641 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0463
- OpenAlex
- W2033685118
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to antimicrobial agents used for animal therapy in pathogenic‐, zoonotic‐ and indicator bacteria isolated from different food animals in Denmark: a baseline study for the Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programme (DANMAP). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1998.tb00222.x
- The paper
- AARESTRUP, F. M., BAGER, F., JENSEN, N. E., MADSEN, M., MEYLING, A., & WEGENER, H. C. (1998). Resistance to antimicrobial agents used for animal therapy in pathogenic‐, zoonotic‐ and indicator bacteria isolated from different food animals in Denmark: a baseline study for the Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programme (DANMAP). APMIS. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1998.tb00222.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.