The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment
Open accessAbstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in humans is inter-linked with AMR in other populations, especially farm animals, and in the wider environment. The relatively few bacterial species that cause disease in humans, and are the targets of antibiotic treatment, constitute a tiny subset of the overall diversity of bacteria that includes the gut microbiota and vast numbers in the soil. However, resistance can pass between these different populations; and homologous resistance genes have been found in pathogens, normal flora and soil bacteria. Farm animals are an important component of this complex system: they are exposed to enormous quantities of antibiotics (despite attempts at reduction) and act as another reservoir of resistance genes. Whole genome sequencing is revealing and beginning to quantify the two-way traffic of AMR bacteria between the farm and the clinic. Surveillance of bacterial disease, drug usage and resistance in livestock is still relatively poor, though improving, but achieving better antimicrobial stewardship on the farm is challenging: antibiotics are an integral part of industrial agriculture and there are very few alternatives. Human production and use of antibiotics either on the farm or in the clinic is but a recent addition to the natural and ancient process of antibiotic production and resistance evolution that occurs on a global scale in the soil. Viewed in this way, AMR is somewhat analogous to climate change, and that suggests that an intergovernmental panel, akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, could be an appropriate vehicle to actively address the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global trends in emerging infectious diseases
Jones, K. E., Patel, N. G., Levy, M. A., Storeygard, A., Balk, D., Gittleman, J. L., & Daszak, P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06536 · Cited by 8,338
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871
Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions
Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., Vlieghe, E., Hara, G. L., Gould, I. M., Goossens, H., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70318-9 · Cited by 4,439
Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine
Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 · Cited by 3,358
Risk factors for human disease emergence
Taylor, L. H., Latham, S. M., & woolhouse, M. E. J. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0888 · Cited by 2,835
Self-citationAntibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens
Forsberg, K. J., Reyes, A., Wang, B., Selleck, E. M., Sommer, M. O. A., & Dantas, G. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1220761 · Cited by 1,650
Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity
Cho, I., Yamanishi, S., Cox, L., Methé, B. A., Zavadil, J., Li, K., Gao, Z., Mahana, D., Raju, K., Teitler, I., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11400 · Cited by 1,613
Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora
Sommer, M. O. A., Dantas, G., & Church, G. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176950 · Cited by 878
Spoor, L. E., McAdam, P. R., Weinert, L. A., Rambaut, A., Hasman, H., Aarestrup, F. M., Kearns, A. M., Larsen, A. R., Skov, R. L., & Fitzgerald, J. R. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00356-13 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Manyi-Loh, C., Mamphweli, S., Meyer, E., & Okoh, A. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23040795 · Cited by 1,808
Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses
Van, T. T. H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P. M., & Coloe, P. J. (2020) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031 · Cited by 451
Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production
Cameron, A., & McAllister, T. A. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-016-0127-3 · Cited by 207
“Sweden was the first country to ban AGPs in 1986 [17], a policy that likely con-”
BackgroundWater and sanitation: an essential battlefront in the war on antimicrobial resistance
Bürgmann, H., Frigon, D., H Gaze, W., M Manaia, C., Pruden, A., Singer, A. C., F Smets, B., & Zhang, T. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiy101 · Cited by 182
D’Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bini, F., Mazziga, E., Mazzacane, S., & Caselli, E. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10020225 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Woolhouse, M., Ward, M., van Bunnik, B., & Farrar, J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-06-05
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 1670
- Pages
- 20140083
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2110053329
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 28.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2014.0083
- The paper
- Woolhouse, M., Ward, M., van Bunnik, B., & Farrar, J. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
