Cited by 67Social Policies and FamilyFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

The Apparent Failure of Russia's Pronatalist Family Policies

Frejka, Tomas, Zakharov, Sergei·2013·Population and Development Review

Abstract

Russia has a history of pronatalist policies dating back to the 1930s. Two sets of pronatalist measures were implemented during the past 40 years. The one designed in the early 1980s proved to be a clear failure. Instead of raising fertility, completed cohort fertility declined from 1.8 births per woman for the 1960 birth cohort to 1.6 for the 1968 cohort. The government of President Putin became concerned with the dire demographic conditions of high mortality and low fertility in Russia in the 1990s and early 2000s. A comprehensive set of pronatalist measures came into effect in January 2007. The period total fertility rate increased from 1.3 births per woman in 2006 to 1.6 in 2011, which the authorities view as an unqualified success. An unbiased demographic evaluation as well as analyses of Russian experts reveals that apparently the measures mainly caused a lowering of the age at birth and shortening of birth intervals. It appears that any real fertility increase is questionable, i.e. cohort fertility is not likely to increase appreciably. The recent pronatalist measures are likely to turn out to be a failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00631.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In countries with very strong pronatalist policy frameworks, such as Iran, Hungary, and Russian Federation, family-supporting policies can be effectively drowned out by narrative and, in some cases, policies which directly push back against women's rights, including the right to work.

    “In countries with very strong pronatalist policy frameworks, such as Iran, Hungary, and Russian Federation, it is often the case that family-supporting policies (such as baby bonuses, childcare, and parental leave) can be effectively drowned about by narrative and, in some cases, policies which directly push back against women's rights, including the right to work (Cook, Iarskaia-Smirnova, and Koz”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Frejka and Zakharov 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frejka, T., & Zakharov, S.
Affiliations
  • Independent consultant Sanibel Florida
  • Deputy Director, Institute of Demography, Higher School of Economics State University Moscow
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
635-647
ISSN
  • 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1728-4457
OpenAlex
W2059465947
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
pronatalist policy, family policy, fertility policy, cohort fertility, age at first birth, birth interval, low fertility, Russia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review