Cited by 100Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Differences and Values

Asian-Americans' Creative Styles in Asian and American Situations: Assimilative and Contrastive Responses as a Function of Bicultural Identity Integration

Mok, Aurelia, Morris, Michael W.·2010·Management and Organization Review

Abstract

Bicultural individuals vary in the degree to which their two cultural identities are integrated. Among Asian-Americans, for instance, some experience their Asian and American sides as compatible whereas others experience them as conflicting. Past research on judgments finds this individual difference affects the way bicultural individuals respond to situations that cue their cultures. Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity integration (BII) assimilate to norms of the cued culture (e.g., they exhibit typically American judgments when in situations that cue American culture), whereas Asian-Americans with low BII do the opposite, contrasting against the cue (e.g., they exhibit typically Asian judgments when in American situations). We investigated whether this dynamic similarly affects creative performance, which differs cross-culturally in that novelty is encouraged more by American than East Asian norms. In two experiments, we found that cues to American (vs. Asian) culture increase the novelty of solutions in divergent thinking tasks for Asian-Americans with high BII (assimilative response) yet decrease it for Asian-Americans with low BII (contrastive response). We discuss theoretical implications for culture and creativity research and practical implications for firms seeking to foster creativity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00190.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity generated more novel ideas after exposure to American than to Asian cues.

    “Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity generated more novel ideas after exposure to American than to Asian cues (Mok & Morris, 2010).”

    From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Mok & Morris, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mok, A., & Morris, M. W.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Management and Organization Review
Published
2010-11
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
371-390
ISSN
  • 1740-8776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8784
OpenAlex
W1838923076
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Management and Organization Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
Asian Americans, bicultural identity integration, assimilation, creative performance, divergent thinking, cultural cues, culture and creativity, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review