Asian-Americans' Creative Styles in Asian and American Situations: Assimilative and Contrastive Responses as a Function of Bicultural Identity Integration
Abstract
Bicultural individuals vary in the degree to which their two cultural identities are integrated. Among Asian-Americans, for instance, some experience their Asian and American sides as compatible whereas others experience them as conflicting. Past research on judgments finds this individual difference affects the way bicultural individuals respond to situations that cue their cultures. Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity integration (BII) assimilate to norms of the cued culture (e.g., they exhibit typically American judgments when in situations that cue American culture), whereas Asian-Americans with low BII do the opposite, contrasting against the cue (e.g., they exhibit typically Asian judgments when in American situations). We investigated whether this dynamic similarly affects creative performance, which differs cross-culturally in that novelty is encouraged more by American than East Asian norms. In two experiments, we found that cues to American (vs. Asian) culture increase the novelty of solutions in divergent thinking tasks for Asian-Americans with high BII (assimilative response) yet decrease it for Asian-Americans with low BII (contrastive response). We discuss theoretical implications for culture and creativity research and practical implications for firms seeking to foster creativity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity generated more novel ideas after exposure to American than to Asian cues.
“Asian-Americans with high bicultural identity generated more novel ideas after exposure to American than to Asian cues (Mok & Morris, 2010).”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Mok & Morris, 2010
Cites
Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents
Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x · Cited by 1,384 · see citing works
Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts
Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00191.x · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103 · see citing works
Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F. (2015) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839214563595 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts
Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00191.x · Cited by 263 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mok, A., & Morris, M. W.
- Affiliations
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Columbia University (US)
- Venue
- Management and Organization Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-390
- ISSN
- 1740-8776 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-8784
- OpenAlex
- W1838923076
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management and Organization Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- Asian Americans, bicultural identity integration, assimilation, creative performance, divergent thinking, cultural cues, culture and creativity, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review