Cited by 44Diabetes Management and EducationDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchDiabetes Management and Research

Self‐Management Abilities of Diabetes in People With an Intellectual Disability Living in New Zealand

Hale, Leigh A., Trip, Henrietta T., Whitehead, Lisa, Conder, Jenny·2011·Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Self‐management of diabetes is encouraged; however, it is not an easy task and requires a good understanding of the disease. To determine how to improve the self‐management abilities of diabetes in people with an intellectual disability (ID), this study explored the knowledge and understanding of diabetes held by a select group of adults with diabetes. The group was made up of 14 adult New Zealanders (eight males and six females; age range 23–69 years) with type 1 diabetes (n = 6) and type 2 diabetes (n = 8). They and their nominated key informants were interviewed. Blood sugar levels (gained from using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests) were obtained on all participants. HbA1c levels ranged from 5.4% to 12.3%. The participants fell into three categories of understanding diabetes: (1) those who had a good understanding of the disease; (2) those who had some knowledge but their actual understanding was limited; and (3) those who demonstrated only a very basic knowledge. It was found that all of the adults were actively engaged in the self‐management process, and all appeared to have some understanding of the role of diet, blood sugar levels, and exercise in the management of their disease. Support from others was important in this process, even for those adults who had a good understanding of the disease. Diabetes significantly impacted the adults' lives, and in some cases, prevented them from living independently. When interviewed, the adults suggested strategies to assist with self‐management such as the use of a “buddy” system to encourage exercise. Authors concluded that adults with ID can be engaged in self‐management of their diabetes. However, it is important that they continue to receive education and support throughout their lives and that time be spent with each individual to identify how to provide the best education and support. Peer‐led education and user‐friendly resources are recommended to achieve lifelong education and support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00314.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hale, L. A., Trip, H. T., Whitehead, L., & Conder, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Donald Beasley Institute (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hale, Leigh A.
Venue
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
223-230
ISSN
  • 1741-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-1130
OpenAlex
W2130472843
Cited by
44
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management, intellectual disability, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, diabetes knowledge, HbA1c, peer support, peer education, health education, independent living, physical activity, diet, adults with intellectual disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review