CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 444Family Dynamics and RelationshipsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Childhood Adultification in Economically Disadvantaged Families: A Conceptual Model

Burton, Linda·2007·Family Relations
DOI 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract:This article presents an emergent conceptual model of childhood adultification and economic disadvantage derived from 5 longitudinal ethnographies of children and adolescents growing up in low‐income families. Childhood adultification involves contextual, social, and developmental processes in which youth are prematurely, and often inappropriately, exposed to adult knowledge and assume extensive adult roles and responsibilities within their family networks. Exemplar cases from the ethnographies are integrated in the discussion to illustrate components of the model. Four successive levels of adultification are described: precocious knowledge, mentored‐adultification, peerification/spousification, and parentification. The developmental assets and liabilities children incur also are discussed. Recommendations for school, health care, and social service practitioners working with low‐income families and children are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Boo K, 2001, After welfare, The New Yorker, 93
  2. Burton L. M., 1995, Intergenerational issues in aging, 79
  3. Burton L. M., 2003, Adultified children in need‐based families: A discourse for service‐learning
  4. Burton L. M., 2005, Emerging issues in African American family life, 166
  5. Burton L. M., 1996, Essays on ethnography and human development, 395
  6. Corsaro W. A., 2005, The sociology of childhood
  7. Jenks C, 2005, Childhood
  8. Jurkovic G. J., 1997, Lost childhoods: The treatment of the parentified child
  9. Quane J. M., 2007, Complex lives and compounded problems: Understanding the effects of work and welfare changes on adolescents in low‐income families
  10. Sheehan S, 1993, A lost childhood, The New Yorker, 54
  11. Wilkerson I, First born, fast grown: The manful life of Nicolas, 10, New York Times, 16
  12. Winston P., 1999, Welfare, children, and families: Overview and design

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 444

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Burton, L.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Burton, Linda
Venue
Family Relations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-06
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
329-345
ISSN
  • 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3729
DOI
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x
OpenAlex
W2169267182
Cited by
438
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 31
FWCI
39.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Family Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
economic disadvantage, low-income households, parentification, child development, conceptual model, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review