Cited by 12Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEducation Discipline and InequalityDisability Rights and Representation

“Ain’t Nobody About to Trap me”: The Violence of Multi-System Collusion and Entrapment for Incarcerated Disabled Girls of Color

Harvey, Brianna, Cabral, Brian, Annamma, Subini Ancy, Morgan, Jamelia·2024·Journal of School Violence

Abstract

Incarcerated disabled Girls of Color reside and exist within a nexus of systems that continually entrap them through the ongoing use of carceral logics. Utilizing interviews from a larger qualitative study, this article centers the lived experiences of disabled Girls of Color by interrogating the collusive partnerships between schools, child “welfare,” and other related systems in entrapping and criminalizing them. The narratives shared by the incarcerated disabled Girls of Color highlight the role of schools in perpetuating state induced entrapment, how multi-system collusion makes carceral and state-sanctioned protection systems indistinguishable, and showcase the creative ways that Girls of Color resist and subvert confinement and entrapment within carceral apparatuses. Ultimately, this article recognizes how multiple systems are set up to trap incarcerated disabled Girls of Color through collusive relations. However, through forged connections, economies, and the girls’ savvy and ingenuity, their experiences remind us that ‘nobody about to trap’ them fully.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15388220.2023.2297035

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harvey et al. (2024) argued that this complicity is robustly intertwined between systems of social welfare alongside others, such as schools, hospitals, juvenile courts, referring to these dynamics explicitly as 'multisystem collusion.'

    “Harvey et al. (2024) have argued elsewhere, for example, that this complicity is robustly intertwined between systems of social welfare alongside others, such as schools, hospitals, juvenile courts, to name a few, referring to these dynamics explicitly as 'multisystem collusion.'”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, B., Cabral, B., Annamma, S. A., & Morgan, J.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Harvey, Brianna
Venue
Journal of School Violence
Published
2024-02-18
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
202-219
ISSN
  • 1538-8220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-8239
OpenAlex
W4391932078
Cited by
11
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of School Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
incarceration, entrapment, carceral logics, school-to-prison pipeline, child welfare, criminalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review