Cited by 465Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRace, History, and American Society

Correlates in Children's Experiences of Parents' Racial Socialization Behaviors

Hughes, Diane, Johnson, Deborah·2001·Journal of Marriage and Family

Abstract

This study examined racial socialization processes among 94 African American parents of third‐, fourth‐, and fifth‐grade children as they were predicted by children's ethnic identity exploration and unfair treatment as well as by parents' ethnic identity and discrimination experiences. Findings indicated that children's ethnic identity exploration and parents' perceptions that their children had been treated unfairly by an adult because of their race were both significantly associated with the frequency of messages to children regarding discrimination (Preparation for Bias). Parents' perceptions of children's unfair treatment from an adult and children's perceptions that they had been treated unfairly by peers were significantly associated with parents' cautions and warnings to children about intergroup relations (Promotion of Mistrust). Moreover, the influence of parents' perceptions on Promotion of Mistrust were especially pronounced when children also reported unfair treatment from adults. Children's identity exploration and unfair treatment were not associated with parents' emphasis on ethnic pride, heritage, and diversity (Cultural Socialization/Pluralism). Thus, findings suggest that parental factors are most central in the racial socialization messages that children receive. However, children's perceptions of discrimination and information seeking regarding their own history appear to have some influence on parental messages about race.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00981.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reappearance of a negative discrimination-self-esteem association at high levels of preparation for bias supports prior theory that devaluation from discriminatory experiences may be intensified by frequent focus on racism.

    “This result supports prior theory suggesting that feelings of devaluation that may result from discriminatory experiences might be intensified by a frequent focus on racism (Hughes & Johnson, 2001; Stevenson et al., 1997).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 465

Authors
Hughes, D., & Johnson, D.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Diane
Venue
Journal of Marriage and Family
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-11
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
981-995
ISSN
  • 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3737
OpenAlex
W1970643968
Cited by
465
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
racial socialization, African American parents, unfair treatment, discrimination, ethnic identity, intergroup relations, distrust, ethnic pride, cultural pluralism, parental messages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review