Cited by 165Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teen Sexual Behavior: Applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action

Abstract

We examined the utility of the theory of reasoned action for predicting sexual intercourse among teenagers and determined whether it holds for both genders and for those with and without prior sexual experience. The data include 749 students who were in 9th–11th grades when the predictors were measured and in 10th–12th grades when sexual intercourse was assessed. About half (53%) were girls, about half (48%) were non‐Hispanic European Americans. Results showed that prior sexual experience was related to a higher rate of sexual intercourse, but boys and girls did not differ. Tests of the causal model for subgroups (boy and girl virgins, boy and girl nonvirgins) yielded similar results. As predicted, paths from intentions to behavior and from norms and attitudes to intentions were significant, as were paths from outcome and normative beliefs to attitude and norm, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00885.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82845-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/019251 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/109019819201900209 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00540.x · DOI
  5. Berman S. M., 1999, Adolescents and STDs, 129
  6. 10.2307/585640 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x · DOI
  8. Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 136
  9. 10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.443 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/353158 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/jpepsy/18.2.209 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF00289926 · DOI
  13. 10.1207/s15327795jra0903_3 · DOI
  14. Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
  15. 10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.255 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1164 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/1054-139X(94)90508-8 · DOI
  18. 10.3109/00952999809001703 · DOI
  19. Halpern C. T., 1999, Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives, 127
  20. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hoppe M. J., 1996, Teens speak out about HIV/AIDS: A report of data on the knowledge of risk and decision‐making
  22. Hoyle R. H., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications, 158
  23. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.429 · DOI
  24. Hu L., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications, 76
  25. Jöreskog K. G., 1989, LISREL 7: A guide to the program and application (2nd ed)
  26. Jöreskog K. G., 1996, Advanced structural equation models: Issues and techniques, 153
  27. 10.2307/351862 · DOI
  28. 10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150200063019 · DOI
  29. Kline R. B., 1998, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling
  30. 10.1080/00224498909551506 · DOI
  31. 10.4135/9781412984577 · DOI
  32. 10.4135/9781412983778 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00143.x · DOI
  35. Moore K. A., 1998, A statistical portrait of adolescent sex, contraception and childbearing
  36. Moore K. A., 1995, Adolescent sex, contraception, and childbearing: A review of recent research
  37. 10.1080/08870449808406747 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90093-3 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/BF02293798 · DOI
  40. Muthén B. O., 1998, Mplus user's guide: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers
  41. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2001.tb01314.x · DOI
  42. 10.1002/casp.2450010205 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/2648232 · DOI
  44. 10.1001/jama.286.5.572 · DOI
  45. 10.2307/2991568 · DOI
  46. Small S. J., 1994, Adolescent sexual activity: An ecological, risk‐factor approach, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 477
  47. South S. J., 2000, Deciphering community and race effects on adolescent premarital childbearing, Social Forces, 78, 1379, 10.2307/3006178 · DOI
  48. 10.5993/AJHB.24.4.7 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/354014 · DOI
  50. Wickens T. D., 1989, Multiway contingency table analysis for the social sciences
  51. Wothke W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Gillmore, M. R., Archibald, M. E., Morrison, D. M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E. A., Hoppe, M. J., Nahom, D., & Murowchick, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Journal of Marriage and Family
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
885-897
ISSN
  • 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3737
OpenAlex
W2071060130
Cited by
165
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
theory of reasoned action, adolescent sexual behavior, sexual intercourse, gender differences, intention, attitudes, social norms, outcome beliefs, normative beliefs, causal models, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review