Cited by 1,885Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCultural Differences and Values

Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development.

Harris, Judith Rich·1995·Psychological Review

Abstract

Do parents have any important long-term effects on the development of their child's personality? This article examines the evidence and concludes that the answer is no. A new theory of development is proposed: that socialization is context-specific and that outside-the-home socialization takes place in the peer groups of childhood and adolescence. Intraand intergroup processes, not dyadic relationships, are responsible for the transmission of culture and for environmental modification of children's personality characteristics. The universality of children's groups explains why development is not derailed by the wide variations in parental behavior found within and between societies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.458

Cites

285 of 285 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The family fixed-effects design rules out many sources of confounding, but it is necessary to control for confounding influences not shared by twins, such as cognitive and behavioral differences.

    “Although the family fixed‐effects design rules out many sources of confounding, it is necessary to control for confounding influences that are not shared by twins, such as cognitive and behavioral differences (Beaver, 2008; Harris, 1995; Knopik, Neiderhiser, DeFries, & Plomin, 2017).”
  • Children identify with a peer group and adapt their own behavior to fit in with the behavioral norms of the group, while distinguishing themselves from other groups.

    “Harris ' (1995) ' group socialization theory ' suggests that children identify with a peer group and adapt their own behavior to fi t in with the behavioral norms of the group, while distinguishing themselves from other groups.”

    From Cross-age peer mentoring for youth: A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Harris, 1995

  • Social relationships are increasingly important across childhood and adolescence for healthy identity formation and mental well-being.

    “Social relationships are increasingly important across childhood and adolescence for healthy identity formation and mental well-being [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, J. R.
Corresponding author
Harris, Judith Rich
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1995-07
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
458-489
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2026596343
Cited by
1,885
References
285
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 115
FWCI
17.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
child development, personality development, peer groups, adolescent peer groups, intergroup processes, cultural transmission, parental influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review