Divorce, race, and military service: More than equal pay and equal opportunity
Abstract
Several researchers have suggested that the persistently higher rate of divorce among Blacks may be due to hard‐to‐measure concepts such as culture or norms. To attack this problem, we use data from the NLSY‐79 to examine the risk of divorce among enlisted active‐duty military servicemen where economic differences and the negative effects of discrimination are minimized. Our results indicate that military service reduces the likelihood of marital dissolution among Blacks serving in the Army and that this finding is not likely the result of unobserved selectivity. We attribute the latter finding to the fact that the Army has a well‐defined career ladder for Blacks that fully integrates them into leadership positions providing role models and positive work environments that reduce stress associated with discrimination and promote stable marriages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Active duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation, increases the likelihood of first marriage, and leads to greater stability of marriage, and all of these effects were greater for blacks than for whites.
“active duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation, increases the likelihood of first marriage, and leads to greater stability of marriage and all of these effects were greater for blacks than for whites [37,38,39].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [38]
Research on military enlistment indicates that it has positive effects on family formation and stability.
“Research on military enlistment indicates that it has positive effects on family formation and stability.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miles to Go before We Sleep: Racial Inequities in Health
Williams, D. R. (2012) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146512455804 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action
Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16040606 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Racism and Health II: A Needed Research Agenda for Effective Interventions
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213487341 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
- Authors
- Teachman, J. D., & Tedrow, L.
- Affiliations
- Western Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Teachman, Jay D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-23
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1030-1044
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W2165424663
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- divorce, military service, United States Army, marital stability, discrimination, career ladder, role models, work environment, stress, selectivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review