The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self‐Determination and American Indian Education: An Illusion of Control
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In practice, local control confronts bureaucratic constraints so overwhelming that federal self-determination legislation has been critiqued as a thinly disguised tool for strengthening the federal stranglehold over Indigenous affairs.
“In practice, local control confronts bureaucratic constraints so overwhelming that federal self-determination legislation has been critiqued by Native and non-Native observers alike as a thinly disguised tool for strengthening the federal stranglehold over Indigenous affairs (see, e.g., American Indian Policy Review Commission [AIPRC], 1976; U.S. Congress, 1977; Senese, 1986).”
From When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal (2002) · cites this paper as Senese, 1986
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal
Lomawaima, K. T., & McCarty, T. L. (2002) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312039002279 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Senese, G.
- Affiliations
- Blackburn College (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Senese, Guy
- Venue
- Educational Theory
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-164
- ISSN
- 0013-2004 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5446
- OpenAlex
- W2088160908
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Theory (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- self-determination (international law), Native American education, Native American students, educational control, Indigenous education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
