Cited by 8Schizophrenia research and treatmentPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Antipsychotic use in the elderly: what doctors say they do, and what they do

Tiller, John, Ames, David, Brodaty, Henry, Byrne, Gerard, Chawla, Sudarshan, Halliday, Graeme, Snowdon, John, Hepworth, Graham +2 more·2008·Australasian Journal on Ageing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review psychiatrists' attitudes and actual practice on the use of typical and atypical antipsychotics in the elderly. METHODS: Audit data were collected from 18-old-age psychiatry units across Australia. The attitudes of old age psychiatrists and their perceptions of the efficacy, tolerability and clinical usefulness of antipsychotics were examined. RESULTS: The medications used for 321 patients were audited, and the attitudes of the 57 prescribing doctors were assessed. All available atypicals were prescribed and reported as more efficacious and clinically useful than typicals. Adverse events perceived by doctors as an obstacle to prescribing were more frequent than reported adverse event rates in product information. All diagnostic groups improved. Off-label use comprised almost 22% in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are impediments to prescribing, more so with typical than atypical antipsychotics. All available atypicals were used and appeared effective in this elderly population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00308.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiller, J., Ames, D., Brodaty, H., Byrne, G., Chawla, S., Halliday, G., Snowdon, J., Hepworth, G., McArdle, P., & Schweitzer, I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Fremantle Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Tiller, John
Venue
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-29
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
134-142
ISSN
  • 0726-4240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-6381
  • 1741-6612
OpenAlex
W2010323282
Cited by
8
References
34
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal on Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, elderly patients, typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, off-label drug use, adverse drug reactions, prescribing attitudes, geriatric psychiatry
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Psychiatry, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antipsychotic Agents, Geriatric Assessment, Drug Utilization Review, Risk Assessment, Maximum Tolerated Dose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review