The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementary and alternative medicine use in England: results from a national survey: CAM use in England: A national survey
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In many countries, recent data on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are available. However, in England, there is a paucity of such data. We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of CAM use in England. DESIGN: Data were obtained from the Health Survey for England 2005, a national household survey that included questions on CAM use. We used binary logistic regression modelling to explore whether demographic, health and lifestyle factors predict CAM use. RESULTS: Data were available for 7630 respondents (household response rate 71%). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of CAM use were 44.0% and 26.3% respectively; 12.1% had consulted a practitioner in the preceding 12 months. Massage, aromatherapy and acupuncture were the most commonly used therapies. Twenty-nine percent of respondents taking prescription drugs had used CAM in the last 12 months. Women (OR 0.491, 95% CI: 0.419, 0.577), university educated respondents (OR 1.296, 95% CI: 1.088, 1.544), those suffering from anxiety or depression (OR 1.341, 95% CI: 1.074, 1.674), people with poorer mental health (on GHQ: OR 1.062, 95% CI 1.026, 1.100) and lower levels of perceived social support (1.047, 95% CI: 1.008, 1.088), people consuming ≥ 5 portions of fruit and vegetables a day (OR 1.327, 95% CI: 1.124, 1.567) were significantly more likely to use CAM. CONCLUSION: Complementary and alternative medicine use in England remains substantial, even amongst those taking prescription drugs. These data serve as a valuable reminder to medical practitioners to ask patients about CAM use and should be routinely collected to facilitate prioritisation of the research agenda in CAM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700021644 · Cited by 5,459
Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B., & Nahin, R. L. (2008) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e623942009-001 · Cited by 3,147
Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002
Barnes, P. M., Powell-Griner, E., McFann, K., & Nahin, R. L. (2004) · Seminars in Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sigm.2004.07.003 · Cited by 2,177
The English indices of deprivation 2004
Noble, M., Wright, G., Dibben, C., Smith, G., McLennan, D., Anttila, C., Barnes, H., Mokhtar, C., Noble, S., & Gardner, J. (2004) · Cited by 1,494
Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey
Thomas, K. J., Nicholl, J. P., & Coleman, P. (2001) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1054/ctim.2000.0407 · Cited by 690
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Australia: A National Population-Based Survey
Xue, C. C. L., Zhang, A. L., Lin, V., Da Costa, C., & Story, D. F. (2007) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2006.6355 · Cited by 645
The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK
Ernst, E., & White, A. (2000) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0965-2299(00)90833-1 · Cited by 499
Self-citationDe Jesus Mari, J., & Williams, P. (1985) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700031500 · Cited by 469
Madsen, M. V., Gotzsche, P. C., & Hrobjartsson, A. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a3115 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Foley, H., Steel, A., Cramer, H., Wardle, J., & Adams, J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38279-8 · Cited by 253
The Feasibility of Mindfulness Training to Reduce Stress among Social Workers: A Conceptual Paper
Beer, O. W. J., Phillips, R., Stepney, L., & Quinn, C. R. (2020) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcz104 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunt, K. J., Coelho, H. F., Wider, B., Perry, R., Hung, S. K., Terry, R., & Ernst, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-08-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1496-1502
- ISSN
- 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1584171701
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 42.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complementary and alternative medicine use in England: results from a national survey: CAM use in England: A national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02484.x
- The paper
- Hunt, K. J., Coelho, H. F., Wider, B., Perry, R., Hung, S. K., Terry, R., & Ernst, E. (2010). Complementary and alternative medicine use in England: results from a national survey: CAM use in England: A national survey. International Journal of Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02484.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.