Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system

Open access
Klammt, Christian, Schwarz, Daniel, Fendler, Klaus, Haase, Winfried, Dötsch, Volker, Bernhard, Frank·2005·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Cell‐free expression has become a highly promising tool for the fast and efficient production of integral membrane proteins. The proteins can be produced as precipitates that solubilize in mild detergents usually without any prior denaturation sttif. Alternatively, membrane proteins can be synthesized in a soluble form by adding detergents to the cell‐free system. However, the effects of a representative variety of detergents on the production, solubility and activity of a wider range of membrane proteins upon cell‐free expression are currently unknown. We therefore analyzed the cell‐free expression of three structurally very different membrane proteins, namely the bacterial α‐helical multidrug transporter, EmrE, the β‐barrel nucleoside transporter, Tsx, and the porcine vasopressin receptor of the eukaryotic superfamily of G‐protein coupled receptors. All three membrane proteins could be produced in amounts of several mg per one ml of reaction mixture. In general, the detergent 1‐myristoyl‐2‐hydroxy‐sn‐glycero‐3‐[phospho‐rac‐(1‐glycerol)] was found to be most effective for the resolubilization of membrane protein precipitates, while long chain polyoxyethylene‐alkyl‐ethers proved to be most suitable for the soluble expression of all three types of membrane proteins. The yield of soluble expressed membrane protein remained relatively stable above a certain threshold concentration of the detergents. We report, for the first time, the high‐level cell‐free expression of a β‐barrel type membrane protein in a functional form. Structural and functional variations of the analyzed membrane proteins are evident that correspond with the mode of expression and that depend on the supplied detergent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05002.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Klammt, C., Schwarz, D., Fendler, K., Haase, W., Dötsch, V., & Bernhard, F.
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-16
Volume
272
Issue
23
Pages
6024-6038
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W1549745968
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05002.x
The paper
Klammt, C., Schwarz, D., Fendler, K., Haase, W., Dötsch, V., & Bernhard, F. (2005). Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system. The FEBS Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05002.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.