The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system
Open accessAbstract
Cell‐free expression has become a highly promising tool for the fast and efficient production of integral membrane proteins. The proteins can be produced as precipitates that solubilize in mild detergents usually without any prior denaturation sttif. Alternatively, membrane proteins can be synthesized in a soluble form by adding detergents to the cell‐free system. However, the effects of a representative variety of detergents on the production, solubility and activity of a wider range of membrane proteins upon cell‐free expression are currently unknown. We therefore analyzed the cell‐free expression of three structurally very different membrane proteins, namely the bacterial α‐helical multidrug transporter, EmrE, the β‐barrel nucleoside transporter, Tsx, and the porcine vasopressin receptor of the eukaryotic superfamily of G‐protein coupled receptors. All three membrane proteins could be produced in amounts of several mg per one ml of reaction mixture. In general, the detergent 1‐myristoyl‐2‐hydroxy‐sn‐glycero‐3‐[phospho‐rac‐(1‐glycerol)] was found to be most effective for the resolubilization of membrane protein precipitates, while long chain polyoxyethylene‐alkyl‐ethers proved to be most suitable for the soluble expression of all three types of membrane proteins. The yield of soluble expressed membrane protein remained relatively stable above a certain threshold concentration of the detergents. We report, for the first time, the high‐level cell‐free expression of a β‐barrel type membrane protein in a functional form. Structural and functional variations of the analyzed membrane proteins are evident that correspond with the mode of expression and that depend on the supplied detergent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cell-free protein synthesis: Applications come of age
Carlson, E. D., Gan, R., Hodgman, C. E., & Jewett, M. C. (2012) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.016 · Cited by 706
Chapter 27 Immobilized-Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC)
Block, H., Maertens, B., Spriestersbach, A., Brinker, N., Kubicek, J., Fabis, R., Labahn, J., & Schäfer, F. (2009) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(09)63027-5 · Cited by 397
Schwarz, D., Junge, F., Durst, F., Frölich, N., Schneider, B., Reckel, S., Sobhanifar, S., Dötsch, V., & Bernhard, F. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.426 · Cited by 271
Self-citationPopot, J.-L., Althoff, T., Bagnard, D., Banères, J.-L., Bazzacco, P., Billon-Denis, E., Catoire, L. J., Champeil, P., Charvolin, D., Cocco, M. J., et al. (2011) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155219 · Cited by 257
Morató, A., Elena-Real, C. A., Popovic, M., Fournet, A., Zhang, K., Allemand, F., Sibille, N., Urbanek, A., & Bernadó, P. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10101458 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Klammt, C., Schwarz, D., Fendler, K., Haase, W., Dötsch, V., & Bernhard, F.
- Venue
- The FEBS Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-16
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6024-6038
- ISSN
- 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
- 1742-4658
- OpenAlex
- W1549745968
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05002.x
- The paper
- Klammt, C., Schwarz, D., Fendler, K., Haase, W., Dötsch, V., & Bernhard, F. (2005). Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of α‐helical and β‐barrel‐type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell‐free expression system. The FEBS Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05002.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.