The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifunctional host defense peptides: intracellular‐targeting antimicrobial peptides
Open accessAbstract
There is widespread acceptance that cationic antimicrobial peptides, apart from their membrane‐permeabilizing/disrupting properties, also operate through interactions with intracellular targets, or disruption of key cellular processes. Examples of intracellular activity include inhibition of DNA and protein synthesis, inhibition of chaperone‐assisted protein folding and enzymatic activity, and inhibition of cytoplasmic membrane septum formation and cell wall synthesis. The purpose of this minireview is to question some widely held views about intracellular‐targeting antimicrobial peptides. In particular, I focus on the relative contributions of intracellular targeting and membrane disruption to the overall killing strategy of antimicrobial peptides, as well as on mechanisms whereby some peptides are able to translocate spontaneously across the plasma membrane. Currently, there are no more than three peptides that have been convincingly demonstrated to enter microbial cells without the involvement of stereospecific interactions with a receptor/docking molecule and, once in the cell, to interfere with cellular functions. From the limited data currently available, it seems unlikely that this property, which is isolated in particular peptide families, is also shared by the hundreds of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides that differ in length, amino acid composition, sequence, hydrophobicity, amphipathicity, and membrane‐bound conformation. Microbial cell entry and/or membrane damage associated with membrane phase/transient pore or long‐lived transitions could be a feature common to intracellular‐targeting antimicrobial peptides and mammalian cell‐penetrating peptides that have an overrepresentation of one or two amino acids, i.e. Trp and Pro, His, or Arg. Differences in membrane lipid composition, as well as differential lipid recruitment by peptides, may provide a basis for microbial cell killing on one hand, and mammalian cell passage on the other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Cited by
Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Copolovici, D. M., Langel, K., Eriste, E., & Langel, Ü. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4057269 · Cited by 963
Park, S.-C., Park, Y., & Hahm, K.-S. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12095971 · Cited by 327
Hayes, B. M. E., Anderson, M. A., Traven, A., van der Weerden, N. L., & Bleackley, M. R. (2014) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1573-8 · Cited by 93
Mechanics of membrane fusion/pore formation
Fuhrmans, M., Marelli, G., Smirnova, Y. G., & Müller, M. (2015) · Chemistry and Physics of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2014.07.010 · Cited by 65
Cn‐AMP2 from green coconut water is an anionic anticancer peptide
Prabhu, S., Dennison, S. R., Mura, M., Lea, R. W., Snape, T. J., & Harris, F. (2014) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2684 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolas, P.
- Venue
- The FEBS Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6483-6496
- ISSN
- 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
- 1742-4658
- OpenAlex
- W1728413725
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifunctional host defense peptides: intracellular‐targeting antimicrobial peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07359.x
- The paper
- Nicolas, P. (2009). Multifunctional host defense peptides: intracellular‐targeting antimicrobial peptides. The FEBS Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07359.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.