The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of Manuka honey dressings on the surface pH of chronic wounds
Open accessAbstract
Chronic non healing wounds have an elevated alkaline environment. The acidic pH of Manuka honey makes it a potential treatment for lowering wound pH, but the duration of effect is unknown. Lowering wound pH can potentially reduce protease activity, increase fibroblast activity and increase oxygen release consequently aiding wound healing. The aim of this study was to analyse the changes in surface pH and size of non healing ulcers following application of Manuka honey dressing after 2 weeks. The study was an open label, non randomised prospective study. Patients presenting consecutively with non healing chronic superficial ulcers, determined by aetiology and no reduction in wound size in previous 3 weeks. Single pH measurements recorded using Blueline 27 glass surface electrode and R 315 pH meter set (Reagecon/Alkem, Co. Clare Ireland). Area determined using Visitrak (Smith & Nephew, Mull, UK) digital planimetry. Apinate ® (Manuka honey) (Comvita, Slough, UK) applied to wounds for 2 weeks after which wounds re‐evaluated. Eight males and nine females with 20 ulcers (3 bilateral) were included: venous, 50% ( n = 10); mixed aetiology, 35% ( n = 7); arterial, 10% ( n = 2) and pressure ulcer, 5% ( n = 1). Reduction in wound pH after 2 weeks was statistically significant ( P < 0·001). Wounds with pH ≥ 8·0 did not decrease in size and wounds with pH ≤ 7·6 had a 30% decrease in size. A reduction in 0·1 pH unit was associated with an 8·1% reduction in wound size ( P < 0·012). The use of Manuka honey dressings was associated with a statistically significant decrease in wound pH and a reduction in wound size. Elevated pH readings at the start were associated with minimal reduction in size. Surface wound pH measurements may contribute to objective wound assessments, but further research is necessary to determine its exact contribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, D. W., van Eps, C., Mudge, D. W., Wiggins, K. J., Armstrong, K., Hawley, C. M., Campbell, S. B., Isbel, N. M., Nimmo, G. R., & Gibbs, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2004110997 · Cited by 162
Cited by
The Composition and Biological Activity of Honey: A Focus on Manuka Honey
Alvarez-Suarez, J., Gasparrini, M., Forbes-Hernández, T., Mazzoni, L., & Giampieri, F. (2014) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods3030420 · Cited by 485
Honey for Wound Healing, Ulcers, and Burns; Data Supporting Its Use in Clinical Practice
Al-Waili, N., Salom, K., & Al-Ghamdi, A. A. (2011) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.78 · Cited by 314
The impact of the pH value on skin integrity and cutaneous wound healing
Schreml, S., Szeimies, R., Karrer, S., Heinlin, J., Landthaler, M., & Babilas, P. (2010) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03413.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Gethin, G. T., Cowman, S., & Conroy, R. M.
- Venue
- International Wound Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-194
- ISSN
- 1742-4801 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-481X
- OpenAlex
- W2047368565
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of Manuka honey dressings on the surface pH of chronic wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-481x.2007.00424.x
- The paper
- Gethin, G. T., Cowman, S., & Conroy, R. M. (2008). The impact of Manuka honey dressings on the surface pH of chronic wounds. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481x.2007.00424.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.