Cited by 83Rabies epidemiology and controlDermatological diseases and infestationsOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review article: Animal bites: An update for management with a focus on infections

Dendle, Claire, Looke, David·2008·Emergency Medicine Australasia

Abstract

Animal bites are a significant public health problem, with an estimated 2% of the population bitten each year. The majority of bites are from dogs and risk factors include young children, men, certain dog breeds and unrestrained dogs. The risk of infection following bites differs among animal species and is dependent on animal dentition and oral flora. Recent studies have demonstrated a broad range of pathogens isolated from infected bite wounds, with Pasteurella species being the predominant isolate from dog and cat bite wounds. Controversy exists about the use of prophylactic antibiotics; however, they are currently only recommended for high-risk bite wounds. Two fatal cases of Australian bat lyssavirus have been reported and bats are the only identified reservoir in Australia. All bat bites are of high risk and should receive post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies. Workers handling bats should be offered routine immunization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01130.x

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Maynard J., 1986, Streptobacillus moniliformis cellulitis with bacteraemia following a dog bite, Commun. Dis. Intell., 86, 2
  2. Prescott PR., 1984, A Practical Guide to Paediatric Intensive Care, 454
  3. Looke DFM., 1992, Zoonoses
  4. Mackenzie JS, 2004, Emerging encephalitogenic viruses: lyssavirus and henipaviruses transmitted by frugivorous bats, Arch. Virol. Suppl., 18, 97
  5. GoldsteinEJ.Bites. In:MandellGL BennettJE DolinR eds.Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases 5th edn. Vol 1 and 2. Philadelphia:Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005:3553–6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 83

Metadata

Authors
Dendle, C., & Looke, D.
Affiliations
  • Austin Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Looke, David
Venue
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
458-467
ISSN
  • 1035-6851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6731
  • 1742-6723
OpenAlex
W2019927237
Cited by
83
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Australasia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Keywords
animal bites, bite wound infection, dog bites, cat bites, Pasteurella, antibiotic prophylaxis, bat bites, Australian bat lyssavirus, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis, oral microbiota
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, Bites and Stings, Humans, Wound Infection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review