The Antimasturbation Crusade in Antebellum American Medicine
Abstract
The antimasturbation fervor that swept through the English–speaking world during the 19th century raged with particular intensity and unequaled duration in the United States. American medical leaders were convinced that masturbation was the underlying cause of nearly all social problems and diseases. Even after the discovery and general acceptance of the germ theory of disease in the late 19th century, the U.S. medical establishment continued to maintain well into the middle of the 20th century that masturbation was both a pathological act and a cause of mental and physical disease. This article explores the dominant themes in the medical doctrines about masturbation that prevailed in the first half of the 19th century, by examining the case reports of five prominent American physicians: Benjamin Rush, Samuel Bayard Woodward, Alfred Hitchcock, Alonzo Garwood, and Edward H. Dixon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genital cutting for the purpose of combating childhood masturbation was recommended by certain segments of the medical profession until the 1950s.
“Genital cutting for this purpose was recommended by certain segments of the medical profession until the 1950s.”
From Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies (2023) · cites this paper as [101]
In England and the United States, both male and female genital operations, including penile circumcision, breaking of clitoral adhesions, and removal of the clitoral hood, were used for decades to combat childhood masturbation.
“In England and the United States, for example, both male and female genital operations, including penile circumcision, breaking of clitoral adhesions, and removal of the clitoral hood, were used for decades to combat childhood masturbation [98–102].”
From Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies (2023) · cites this paper as [101]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santtila, P., Wager, I., Witting, K., Harlaar, N., Jern, P., Johansson, A., Varjonen, M., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2007) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/00926230701620548 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Gruenbaum, E., Earp, B. D., & Shweder, R. A. (2023) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/s41443-022-00581-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Zero Tolerance for Genital Mutilation: a Review of Moral Justifications
Earp, B. D. (2020) · Current Sexual Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s11930-020-00286-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hodges, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Berkeley, CA, USA
- Corresponding author
- Hodges, Frederick M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 722-731
- ISSN
- 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-6109
- OpenAlex
- W1892539144
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Keywords
- masturbation, germ theory, Benjamin Rush, Alfred Hitchcock, history of sexuality, medicalization of sexuality
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Circumcision, Male, Ejaculation, Humans, Masturbation, Morals, United States, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review