The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers
Abstract
Tissue‐engineered skin substitutes such as Apligraf® have emerged over the past 20 years as among the most carefully studied and efficacious of the advanced wound modalities. These products have been proven as effective enhancements to general wound care, promoting wound closure particularly in instances where conventional wound care fails. Marketed for hard‐to‐heal wounds since 1998, Apligraf® has become part of standard wound care in many wound centers across the United States. Despite this situation, few general wound care guidelines incorporate advanced and active wound‐healing technologies, such as tissue‐engineered skin products. Because of this deficiency, appropriate patient selection and proper use of these product remain largely unaddressed within the general wound care community. Here, we describe the development of guidelines surrounding optimal use of the bilayered living cell therapy, Apligraf®, in the treatment of the two types of lower extremity ulcers for which the product is FDA approved: venous leg ulcer and diabetic foot ulcer. The guidelines detailed in this article focus on the identification and selection of patients who are at risk for failure of standard wound care therapy and thus appropriate for Apligraf® treatment. The intended audience for these guidelines is the general wound care practitioner, for whom the developed treatment algorithms and accompanying figure legends should provide practical, user‐friendly direction simplifying both patient selection and appropriate use of Apligraf® within the context of good wound‐healing practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For DFU, negative predictive markers include wound duration and size, site infection, depth of ulceration, location on mid-plantar area or heel, extreme foot deformity, inadequate weight off-loading, patient noncompliance, and poor glycemic control (Cavorsi et al 2006).”
From A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers (2007) · cites this paper as Cavorsi et al 2006
In the citing paper
“Negative predictive markers that have been identified for VLU include: prolonged duration of ulcer (>6 months), large wound size (>5 cm), a history of failure of prior therapy, extensive lipodermatosclerosis, location below the malleolus, and coexisting site infection (Cavorsi et al 2006).”
From A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers (2007) · cites this paper as Cavorsi et al 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines
Adams, A., Soumerai, S., Lomas, J., & Ross-Degnan, D. (1999) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/11.3.187 · Cited by 679
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- McGuckin M, 1996, Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers, Ostomy/Wound Manage, 42, 100
- 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00369.x · DOI
- Kitsner RL, 1996, Diagnosis of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, the “CEAP” classification, 71, 338
- Frykberg RG, 2000, Diabetic foot disorders, a clinical practice guideline, 39, S1
- American Diabetes Association., 1999, Consensus development conference on diabetic foot wound care, Diabetes Care, 22, 1345, 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1354 · DOI
- Eisenbud D, 2004, Skin substitutes and wound healing, current status and challenges, 16, 2
- Tallman P, 1997, Initial rate of healing predicts complete healing of venous ulcers, Arch Dermatol, 133, 1231, 10.1001/archderm.1997.03890460053006 · DOI
- 10.2337/diab.40.10.1305 · DOI
- Skene AI, 1992, Venous leg ulcers, a prognostic index to predict time to healing, 305, 1119
- Margolis DJ, 2003, Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers, predicting which ones will not heal, 115, 627
- FalangaV. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot.Lancet2005; 366: 1736–43. · DOI
- Sabolinski ML, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 411
- 10.1002/bit.260430809 · DOI
- 10.2165/00063030-200216060-00005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archderm.134.3.293 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00201.x · DOI · Paper page
- Moneta GL., 2000, Graftskin (Apligraf®) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers, optimal application techniques, 12, 27A
- 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
- Beusterien K, 2001, The cost effectiveness of Graftskin vs. standard care for diabetic foot ulcers, Diabetes, 50, A496
- Kantor J, 2001, Treatment options for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers, a cost-effectiveness analysis, 27, 347
- 10.2165/00115677-200109110-00005 · DOI
- Kirsner RS, 2002, Clinical and economic outcomes with Graftskin for hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers, a single center experience, 28, 81
- Olin JW, 1999, Medical costs of treating venous stasis ulcers, evidence from a retrospective cohort study, 4, 1
- 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00251.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70566-1 · DOI
- Kerstein MD., 1997, The scientific basis of healing, Adv Wound Care, 10, 30
- Falanga V., 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 155
- Banerjee D, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 165
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00178-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00856-X · DOI
- Vowden P, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 319
- 10.1097/00129334-200203000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10603.x · DOI
- Steed DL, 1996, Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetic ulcer study, J Am Coll Surg, 183, 61
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2000.00347.x · DOI
- Falanga V, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 457
- Sibbald RG, 2000, Preparing the wound bed—debridement, bacterial balance and moisture balance, Ostomy/Wound Manage, 46, 14
- 10.1097/00004045-199906000-00005 · DOI
- Armstrong DG, 2001, Off‐loading the diabetic foot wound, a randomized clinical trial, 24, 1019
- Spencer S., 2002, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
- Cullum N, 2002, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
- 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.576 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.00195.x · DOI
- Margolis DJ, 1999, Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment, a meta-analysis, 22, 692
- Margolis DJ, 1994, Management of chronic venous leg ulcers, a literature-guided approach, 12, 19
- Falanga V., 1997, Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for health care professionals, 165
- Falanga V., 2000, Prognostic factors for the healing of venous and diabetic ulcers, Wounds, 12, 42A
- 10.1067/mjd.2000.107496 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.136.12.1531 · DOI
- 10.1016/0741-5214(88)90466-1 · DOI
- Clement DL, 1999, Venous ulcer reappraisal, insights from an international task force, 36, 42
- Browne A, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 203
- Koeveker GB., 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 233
- Sabolinski ML, 1996, Cultured skin as a ‘smart material’ for healing wounds, experience in venous ulcers, 17, 311
- Falanga V., 1999, How to use Apligraf to treat venous ulcers, Skin Aging, 25, 30
- 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906 · DOI
- Grimshaw JM, 1993, Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice, a systematic review of rigorous evaluations, 342, 1317
Cited by
Zaulyanov, L., & Kirsner, R. S. (2007) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/ciia.2007.2.1.93 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavorsi, J., Vicari, F., Wirthlin, D. J., Ennis, W., Kirsner, R., O'Connell, S. M., Steinberg, J., & Falanga, V.
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-109
- ISSN
- 1067-1927
- 1524-475X
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00098.x
- The paper
- Cavorsi, J., Vicari, F., Wirthlin, D. J., Ennis, W., Kirsner, R., O'Connell, S. M., Steinberg, J., & Falanga, V. (2006). Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00098.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.