Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers

Cavorsi, Joseph, Vicari, Frank, Wirthlin, Douglas J., Ennis, William, Kirsner, Robert, O'Connell, Sean M., Steinberg, John, Falanga, Vincent·2006·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Tissue‐engineered skin substitutes such as Apligraf® have emerged over the past 20 years as among the most carefully studied and efficacious of the advanced wound modalities. These products have been proven as effective enhancements to general wound care, promoting wound closure particularly in instances where conventional wound care fails. Marketed for hard‐to‐heal wounds since 1998, Apligraf® has become part of standard wound care in many wound centers across the United States. Despite this situation, few general wound care guidelines incorporate advanced and active wound‐healing technologies, such as tissue‐engineered skin products. Because of this deficiency, appropriate patient selection and proper use of these product remain largely unaddressed within the general wound care community. Here, we describe the development of guidelines surrounding optimal use of the bilayered living cell therapy, Apligraf®, in the treatment of the two types of lower extremity ulcers for which the product is FDA approved: venous leg ulcer and diabetic foot ulcer. The guidelines detailed in this article focus on the identification and selection of patients who are at risk for failure of standard wound care therapy and thus appropriate for Apligraf® treatment. The intended audience for these guidelines is the general wound care practitioner, for whom the developed treatment algorithms and accompanying figure legends should provide practical, user‐friendly direction simplifying both patient selection and appropriate use of Apligraf® within the context of good wound‐healing practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00098.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. McGuckin M, 1996, Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers, Ostomy/Wound Manage, 42, 100
  2. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00369.x · DOI
  3. Kitsner RL, 1996, Diagnosis of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, the “CEAP” classification, 71, 338
  4. Frykberg RG, 2000, Diabetic foot disorders, a clinical practice guideline, 39, S1
  5. American Diabetes Association., 1999, Consensus development conference on diabetic foot wound care, Diabetes Care, 22, 1345, 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1354 · DOI
  6. Eisenbud D, 2004, Skin substitutes and wound healing, current status and challenges, 16, 2
  7. Tallman P, 1997, Initial rate of healing predicts complete healing of venous ulcers, Arch Dermatol, 133, 1231, 10.1001/archderm.1997.03890460053006 · DOI
  8. 10.2337/diab.40.10.1305 · DOI
  9. Skene AI, 1992, Venous leg ulcers, a prognostic index to predict time to healing, 305, 1119
  10. Margolis DJ, 2003, Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers, predicting which ones will not heal, 115, 627
  11. FalangaV. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot.Lancet2005; 366: 1736–43. · DOI
  12. Sabolinski ML, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 411
  13. 10.1002/bit.260430809 · DOI
  14. 10.2165/00063030-200216060-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1001/archderm.134.3.293 · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00201.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Moneta GL., 2000, Graftskin (Apligraf®) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers, optimal application techniques, 12, 27A
  18. 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Beusterien K, 2001, The cost effectiveness of Graftskin vs. standard care for diabetic foot ulcers, Diabetes, 50, A496
  20. Kantor J, 2001, Treatment options for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers, a cost-effectiveness analysis, 27, 347
  21. 10.2165/00115677-200109110-00005 · DOI
  22. Kirsner RS, 2002, Clinical and economic outcomes with Graftskin for hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers, a single center experience, 28, 81
  23. Olin JW, 1999, Medical costs of treating venous stasis ulcers, evidence from a retrospective cohort study, 4, 1
  24. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00251.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70566-1 · DOI
  26. Kerstein MD., 1997, The scientific basis of healing, Adv Wound Care, 10, 30
  27. Falanga V., 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 155
  28. Banerjee D, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 165
  29. 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00178-0 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00856-X · DOI
  31. Vowden P, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 319
  32. 10.1097/00129334-200203000-00007 · DOI
  33. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10603.x · DOI
  34. Steed DL, 1996, Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetic ulcer study, J Am Coll Surg, 183, 61
  35. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2000.00347.x · DOI
  36. Falanga V, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 457
  37. Sibbald RG, 2000, Preparing the wound bed—debridement, bacterial balance and moisture balance, Ostomy/Wound Manage, 46, 14
  38. 10.1097/00004045-199906000-00005 · DOI
  39. Armstrong DG, 2001, Off‐loading the diabetic foot wound, a randomized clinical trial, 24, 1019
  40. Spencer S., 2002, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
  41. Cullum N, 2002, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
  42. 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.576 · DOI
  43. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.00195.x · DOI
  44. Margolis DJ, 1999, Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment, a meta-analysis, 22, 692
  45. Margolis DJ, 1994, Management of chronic venous leg ulcers, a literature-guided approach, 12, 19
  46. Falanga V., 1997, Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for health care professionals, 165
  47. Falanga V., 2000, Prognostic factors for the healing of venous and diabetic ulcers, Wounds, 12, 42A
  48. 10.1067/mjd.2000.107496 · DOI
  49. 10.1001/archderm.136.12.1531 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0741-5214(88)90466-1 · DOI
  51. Clement DL, 1999, Venous ulcer reappraisal, insights from an international task force, 36, 42
  52. Browne A, 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 203
  53. Koeveker GB., 2001, Cutaneous wound healing, 233
  54. Sabolinski ML, 1996, Cultured skin as a ‘smart material’ for healing wounds, experience in venous ulcers, 17, 311
  55. Falanga V., 1999, How to use Apligraf to treat venous ulcers, Skin Aging, 25, 30
  56. 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906 · DOI
  57. Grimshaw JM, 1993, Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice, a systematic review of rigorous evaluations, 342, 1317

Cited by

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Cavorsi, J., Vicari, F., Wirthlin, D. J., Ennis, W., Kirsner, R., O'Connell, S. M., Steinberg, J., & Falanga, V.
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
102-109
ISSN
  • 1067-1927
  • 1524-475X
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00098.x
The paper
Cavorsi, J., Vicari, F., Wirthlin, D. J., Ennis, W., Kirsner, R., O'Connell, S. M., Steinberg, J., & Falanga, V. (2006). Best‐practice algorithms for the use of a bilayered living cell therapy (Apligraf®) in the treatment of lower‐extremity ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00098.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.