The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced wound‐healing quality with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells autografting after skin injury
Open accessAbstract
Adult stem cells exist in various tissues and organs and have the potential to differentiate into different cell lineages, including bone, cartilage, fat, tendon, muscle, and epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Here, we report that the in vitro expanded and purified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) might take on phenotypes with characteristics of vascular endothelial cells (7% on day 3 and 15% on day 1) or epidermal cells (3% on day 3 and 13% on day 1) after being cultured under different lineage‐specific culture conditions. Also, in vivo grafting experiments showed that 5‐bromodeoxyuridine‐labeled MSCs could convert into the phenotypes of vascular endothelial cells (3.43, 3.46, and 2.94% on days 7, 14, and 28, respectively) in granulation tissues, sebaceous duct cells, and epidermal cells (0–1.49%) in regenerated skin, implying that these grafted MSCs might have transdifferentiated into the above three cell types. Animal autografting experiments with MSCs further confirmed that indices pertaining to wound healing quality, such as the speed of reepithelialization, the number of epidermal ridges and thickness of the regenerated epidermis, the morphology and the number and arrangement of microvasculature, fibroblasts and collagen, were much enhanced. Our results indicate that locally delivered bone marrow MSCs can enhance wound healing quality, and may generate de novo intact skin, resulting in perfect skin regeneration after full‐thickness injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing potency by spontaneous fusion
Ying, Q.-L., Nichols, J., Evans, E. P., & Smith, A. G. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature729 · Cited by 1,494
Cited by
Phinney, D. G., & Prockop, D. J. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0637 · Cited by 1,908
Falanga, V., Iwamoto, S., Chartier, M., Yufit, T., Butmarc, J., Kouttab, N., Shrayer, D., & Carson, P. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0278 · Cited by 783
Skin tissue engineering: wound healing based on stem-cell-based therapeutic strategies
Nourian Dehkordi, A., Mirahmadi Babaheydari, F., Chehelgerdi, M., & Raeisi Dehkordi, S. (2019) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1212-2 · Cited by 533
Kobolak, J., Dinnyes, A., Memic, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Mobasheri, A. (2016) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.09.016 · Cited by 273
Sun, S., Xiao, J., Huo, J., Geng, Z., Ma, K., Sun, X., & Fu, X. (2018) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0758-0 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, X., Fang, L., Li, X., Cheng, B., & Sheng, Z.
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-335
- ISSN
- 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-475X
- OpenAlex
- W2128301515
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced wound‐healing quality with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells autografting after skin injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00128.x
- The paper
- Fu, X., Fang, L., Li, X., Cheng, B., & Sheng, Z. (2006). Enhanced wound‐healing quality with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells autografting after skin injury. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00128.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.