Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells accelerate wound healing in the rat

McFarlin, Kellie, Gao, Xiaohua, Liu, Yong Bo, Dulchavsky, Deborah S., Kwon, David, Arbab, Ali S., Bansal, Mona, Li, Yi, Chopp, Michael, Dulchavsky, Scott A., Gautam, Subhash C.·2006·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) are multipotential stem cells capable of differentiation into numerous cell types, including fibroblasts, cartilage, bone, muscle, and brain cells. BMSCs also secrete a large number of growth factors and cytokines that are critical to the repair of injured tissues. Because of the extraordinary plasticity and the ability of syngeneic or allogeneic BMSCs to secrete tissue‐repair factors, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of BMSCs for healing of fascial and cutaneous incisional wounds in Sprague–Dawley rats. Systemic administration of syngeneic BMSCs (2 × 10 6) once daily for 4 days or a single treatment with 5 × 10 6 BMSCs 24 hours after wounding significantly increased the wound bursting strength of fascial and cutaneous wounds on days 7 and 14 postwounding. Wound healing was also significantly improved following injection of BMSCs locally at the wound site. Furthermore, allogeneic BMSCs were as efficient as syngeneic BMSCs in promoting wound healing. Administration of BMSCs labeled with iron oxides/1,1′‐dioctadecyl‐3,3,3′,3′‐tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate fluorescent dye revealed that systemically administered BMSCs engraft to the wound. The increase in the tensile strength of wounds treated with BMSCs was associated with increased production of collagen in the wound. In addition, BMSC treatment caused more rapid histologic maturation of wounds compared with untreated wounds. These data suggest that cell therapy with BMSCs has the potential to augment healing of surgical and cutaneous wounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00153.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
McFarlin, K., Gao, X., Liu, Y. B., Dulchavsky, D. S., Kwon, D., Arbab, A. S., Bansal, M., Li, Y., Chopp, M., Dulchavsky, S. A., & Gautam, S. C.
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
471-478
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2001179745
Cited by
246
References
1
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells accelerate wound healing in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00153.x
The paper
McFarlin, K., Gao, X., Liu, Y. B., Dulchavsky, D. S., Kwon, D., Arbab, A. S., Bansal, M., Li, Y., Chopp, M., Dulchavsky, S. A., & Gautam, S. C. (2006). Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells accelerate wound healing in the rat. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00153.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.