Cited by 78Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Nipple/Breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women

Levin, Roy, Meston, Cindy·2006·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The role of nipple/breast stimulation in influencing sexual arousal in men and women during lovemaking has only been the subject of opinion-based comment rather than evidence-based study. No attempt to question people about such sexual behavior has ever been undertaken. AIM: The study was designed to ascertain the effects of nipple/breast manipulation in young men and women on their sexual arousal. METHODS: A short questionnaire about nipple/breast stimulation during sexual activity was administered to 301 (148 men; 153 women) sexually experienced undergraduates (age range 17-29 years, 95% between 18 and 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Replies to questions in questionnaire. RESULTS: The major findings in regard to the women were that 81.5% reported that stimulation of their nipples/breasts caused or enhanced their sexual arousal, 78.2% agreed that when sexually aroused such manipulation increased their arousal, 59.1% had asked to have their nipples stimulated during lovemaking, and only 7.2% found that the manipulation decreased their arousal. In regard to the men, 51.7% reported that nipple stimulation caused or enhanced their sexual arousal, 39% agreed that when sexually aroused such manipulation increased their arousal, only 17.1% had asked to have their nipples stimulated, and only 7.5% found that such stimulation decreased their arousal. CONCLUSION: Manipulation of the nipples/breasts causes or enhances sexual arousal in approximately 82% of young women and 52% of young men with only 7-8% reporting that it decreased their arousal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00230.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infusion of OTR antisense oligonucleotides into the medial amygdala of wild-type females impairs social recognition abilities.

    “Likewise, infusion of OTR antisense oligonucleotides into the medial amygdala of wild-type females impairs social recognition abilities [83].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, R., & Meston, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Roy
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
450-454
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2132334617
Cited by
78
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
nipple stimulation, breast stimulation, sexual arousal, sexual behavior, young adults, gender differences, sexual desire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Coitus, Female, Humans, Male, Nipples, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review