Cited by 80Sexual function and dysfunction studiesDupuytren's Contracture and TreatmentsUrological Disorders and Treatments

Peyronie’s Disease Intervention Trials: Methodological Challenges and Issues

Müller, Alexander, Mulhall, John P.·2009·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Peyronie's Disease (PD) has been studied for more than 260 years since Francois de la Peyronie's description in 1743. Based on the current literature, the prevalence of PD seems 3-9% with an average age of onset in the fifth life decade. Much effort has been spent on developing nonsurgical treatment options to cure or at least prevent disease progression. Aim The recent examination of drug trials for erectile dysfunction has led us to assess PD trial methodology more closely. Methods An Iinternet search on PubMed was performed using MeSH words PD, clinical trials, oral, transdermal, intralesional and shock wave therapy focusing on 26 representing studies published over the last 15 years. Mean Outcome Measures. A comprehensive review of the current literature on nonsurgical treatment options for PD was conducted to address methodological issues and challenges in PD trials highlighting trial design, patient population, and symptom and sign assessment. Results The majority of the reviewed studies are underpowered and the heterogeneity in the methodological approach and patient assessment between the studies is one of the remarkable findings from our review. Studies should use a uniform means of defining the degree and type of penile deformity and a large enough cohort of patients should be studied for adequate study power. An ideally designed PD intervention trial should comprise: (i) a randomized, placebo-controlled design; (ii) with a PD patient set representative…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01081.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, A., & Mulhall, J. P.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mulhall, John P.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2009-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
848-861
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2066488908
Cited by
80
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Peyronie's disease, clinical trial design, trial design, intralesional therapy, shock wave therapy, study power, sexual function, pain, consensus recommendations
MeSH terms
Drug Therapy, Humans, Male, Penile Induration, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review