Cited by 46Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

IIEF-15: Unsuitable for assessing erectile function of young men?

Rynja, Sybren, Bosch, Ruud, Kok, Esther, Wouters, Gerlof, De Kort, Laetitia·2010·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) is mainly studied in older males, whereas we measured prevalence of ED in young healthy males using a validated questionnaire. AIM: Assessing the prevalence of ED in young adult men using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and creating a benchmark for ED in this young age group for further research. METHODS: Male students were randomly asked to participate. Men with history of sexual dysfunction or urologic disease were excluded. Age, having a relationship and the IIEF-15 were filled out anonymously and in private. Outcomes of all domains were separately analysed based on relationship and intercourse frequency. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ED measured by the IIEF-15. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one students, aged 21.8 years (17-35, SD 2.98) participated and 14 were excluded. Of 137 students, 81% reported to have an intimate relationship. ED appeared to be present in 46 students (33.6%). The answer "no sexual activity," resulting in a 0-score, was given inconsistently. Outcomes were analysed for students who gave this answer at least once compared with those who never did. Nobody had ED in the group "without 0-scores" (n = 91). All students in the group "with (inconsistent) 0-scores" (n = 46) had ED. Students with a relationship had ED in 24.3% compared with 73.1% in those without a relationship (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When men with inconsistently answered IIEF-15 questionnaires are excluded, a 0% prevalence of ED is found in this age-group. The current scoring method however does not state that these questionnaires should be excluded, and results in a prevalence of ED of 34%. Possibly, the scoring method of the IIEF-15 needs to be reviewed when this questionnaire is used in young, healthy men in order to accurately measure the prevalence of ED.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01847.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such measures are therefore less suited to measure the sexual experiences of single men and men who have sex with men.

    “Such measures are therefore less suited to measure the sexual experiences of single men and men who have sex with men.80, 81, 82”
  • The vast majority of ED case-history tools does not take diversity into account because they are mainly oriented towards heterosexual couples in stable relationship and/or to men who have experienced sexual intercourse in the last 4 weeks preceding the evaluation.

    “Furthermore, the vast majority of ED case-history tools does not take diversity into account because they are mainly oriented towards heterosexual couples in stable relationship and/or to men who have experienced sexual intercourse in the last 4 weeks preceding the evaluation (eg, International Index of Erectile Function).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rynja, S., Bosch, R., Kok, E., Wouters, G., & De Kort, L.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , the Netherlands
  • Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL)
Corresponding author
Rynja, Sybren
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
2825-2830
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W1545774657
Cited by
46
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, young men, IIEF-15, questionnaire scoring, prevalence, sexual activity, relationship status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Health Surveys, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Libido, Male, Netherlands, Orgasm, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Benchmarking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review