The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EFFECTS OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND PROBLEM STRUCTURE ON WORK GROUP PROCESS AND OUTCOMES IN AN ELECTRONIC MEETING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
Organizations are increasingly utilizing electronic meeting systems to enhance work group process and outcomes. Because leadership is a key group attribute, it is important to examine how behaviors of leaders influence work groups using electronic meeting systems. Results of a laboratory experiment indicated that (a) Participants made more supportive remarks under a consultative form of participative leadership than directive leadership; (b) Participants proposed more solutions and made fewer critical remarks for a fairly structured problem than for a moderately structured problem; (c) Participative leadership was more conducive to proposal of solutions for a moderately structured problem, while directive leadership was more conducive for a fairly structured problem; and (d) Frequency of solution proposals in turn affected group productivity and satisfaction. Implications for personnel practitioners and research on leadership in electronic meeting environments are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Whither Industrial and Organizational Psychology in a Changing World of Work?
Cascio, W. F. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.11.928 · Cited by 455
Cited by
DERUE, D. S., NAHRGANG, J. D., WELLMAN, N., & HUMPHREY, S. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x · Cited by 1,356
What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007 · Cited by 1,107
Avolio (2000) · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00062-x · Cited by 767
Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006 · Cited by 670
Somech, A. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305277799 · Cited by 563
Research Note —A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams
Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0149 · Cited by 220
Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research
Wang, Q., Hou, H., & Li, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357 · Cited by 188
Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams
Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12108 · Cited by 170
Miao, Q., Newman, A., & Huang, X. (2014) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.934890 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- KAHAI, S. S., SOSIK, J. J., & AVOLIO, B. J.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-146
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2126640227
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
